At least 44 people injured in massive ‘tsunami’ at wave pool | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

At least 44 people injured in massive ‘tsunami’ at wave pool

Chris Pastrick
1486224_web1_ptr-bigwave-080219

You’d expect huge waves at a “tsunami pool.”

But swimmers at a water park in northeast China got a lot more than they bargained for Tuesday when a malfunction produced a massive wave that injured at least 44 of them.

The South China Morning Post reports the incident happened at the Yulong Shuiyun Water Amusement Park in Longjing, China.

A video clip, showing a fast-moving powerful wave overtaking swimmers.

A statement by the Longjing city government said five people remain in the hospital in stable condition.

“According to the initial stages of the investigation,” the statement said, “the incident was caused by a power cut that damaged electronic equipment in the tsunami pool control room, which led to the waves in the tsunami pool becoming too big and injuring people.”

A worker at the park said the tsunami pool had been shut down temporarily while an investigation was conducted, but that the pool was set to reopen Thursday.

“Online rumors say that a worker wrongly operated the controls, but in reality it was a problem with the equipment,” the worker told the Beijing Times.

Chris Pastrick is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Chris at 412-320-7898, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.