Boeing says 737 Max update is being held up by FAA questions |

Boeing says 737 Max update is being held up by FAA questions

The Washington Post
this April 10, 2019, file photo a Boeing 737 MAX 8 airplane being built for India-based Jet Airways lands following a test flight at Boeing Field in Seattle.

Boeing’s path to returning its 737 Max jet to service is being held up by questions from the Federal Aviation Administration.

The U.S. regulator has asked Boeing to provide more details about “how pilots interact with the airplane controls and displays in different flight scenarios,” the company said in a statement Thursday. A spokesman for the FAA confirmed the agency is asking about pilot interaction on the 737 Max but declined to provide more information about the review process or how long it is expected to take.

“This process will take as long as necessary to ensure the aircraft is returned to service safely,” FAA spokesman Gregory Martin said.

More than two months after a deadly plane crash led to the worldwide grounding of the 737 Max, Boeing is facing mounting pressure from investors, airline customers and suppliers to get its flagship jet back into the air. Airlines are incurring millions of dollars in costs as planes sit idle and Boeing continues to produce 42 planes a month, which it cannot sell until the jet has been cleared by regulators.

Boeing’s timeline for a fix has been a moving target. The company has yet to submit its final package of software fixes to the FAA for approval, something it said it would do by early April. CEO Dennis Muilenburg said in late April that the company had completed its final technical test flight with the updated flight control system and was preparing for a certification flight and formal review by the FAA.

In its statement Thursday, Boeing repeated its claim that its update for the 737 Max software has been completed. Once it has addressed the FAA’s questions, “Boeing will work with the FAA to schedule its certification test flight and submit final certification documentation,” the company said. Boeing said the flight controls have been tested on 360 hours of flights, up from 246 hours in late April.

The FAA’s acting administrator, Daniel K. Elwell told members of Congress this week that the decisions of pilots played a role in the crashes of 737 Max jets in Indonesia and Ethiopia. An automated anti-stall feature activated when it wasn’t supposed to in the October crash in Indonesia, Elwell said. That sent the plane’s nose down repeatedly. The pilots should have responded by turning off the motors to the part of the airplane that was forcing it downward, but they did not, Elwell said.

When the same automated feature – known as the Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System, mistakenly kicked in less than five months later on the 737 Max involved in the Ethiopia crash – the pilots “didn’t adhere to the emergency” directive issued by the FAA in November, Elwell said.

Categories: News | Top Stories | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.