Child dials 911 to report ‘drunk’ school bus driver |

Child dials 911 to report ‘drunk’ school bus driver

Steven Adams

A boy suspected that his school bus driver was drunk so he called the police to turn her in.

A student in Longview, Washington, told police his regular bus driver was behaving oddly, reports KING-5 News. Besides her unusually laid back attitude toward seating on Sept. 12, the driver allegedly used obscenities and blew kisses. But it seems the tipping point for the boy was when the driver ran three red lights with children on the bus, according to reporting by KING-5.

No students were on the bus when police pulled over Catherine Maccarone, 48, and arrested her on suspicion of driving under the influence and reckless endangerment, KING-5 reports.

The fifth grader reportedly made it home safely and told his mother about the incident. KING-5 reports that the mother’s English was not good so she had her son make the call to 911.

“She was drunk. Like, passed three red lights and got on the side road by the 76 and there’s still kids on there,” the boy told the dispatcher, according to KING-5.

“Her eyes, you could tell she was drunk. Her breath sort of smelled like alcohol” he said.

There were at least 90 students on the routes Maccarone drove that afternoon.

Read more of the story at KING-5.

Steven Adams is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Steven at 412-380-5645 or [email protected].

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.