Colorado town pays $50K to woman ticketed for playing Frisbee topless | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Colorado town pays $50K to woman ticketed for playing Frisbee topless

Steven Adams
1919719_web1_ptr-ToplessFrisbee-110919
File

Women have the same rights as men to bare their chests in Loveland, Colorado. At least until city council reviews their indecent exposure law.

Efrosini “Effie” Krokos, 20, has been paid $50,000 and had all charges dropped after she was cited for playing Frisbee topless in her front yard on Sept. 26, reports KDVR Denver.

Attorney David Lane says Krokos was within her rights when she followed her husband’s lead and removed her shirt in public. Her breasts were exposed.

Lane tells KDVR that a February case in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals called Free the Nipple vs. City of Fort Collins established that it is legal for women to be topless in any place it is legal for a man to be topless.

“Ms. Krokos read about this case in the media and when she saw her husband had removed his shirt, she did the same. Scandalized neighbors called the police and an officer came out and issued her a summons,” KDVR quotes Lane in a press release.

Loveland has an ordinance prohibiting the exposure of breasts in public but police will suspend enforcement until city council can review it, KDVR reports.

The $50,000 settlement is the first damage claim paid to a woman wrongfully charged for being topless in the U.S., Lane told KDVR.

Steven Adams is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Steven at 412-380-5645 or [email protected].

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.