Couple who spent $450 for an iPhone instead got 2 bars of soap |

Couple who spent $450 for an iPhone instead got 2 bars of soap

Matt Rosenberg
Fox 2 Detroit reported a Michigan couple had bought an iPhone for $450 on the Letgo app but instead received two bars of soap.

A couple who saved money to buy their 14-year-old daughter an iPhone were left with a dud.

And suds.

Fox 2 Detroit reported the Michigan couple had bought an iPhone for $450 on the Letgo app and scheduled to meet the 18-year-old seller.

At the exchange in the parking lot of an apartment complex, Thomas Greenarch handed the seller his money before he could open the box to check the phone. He found two bars of soap inside as the seller ran back inside the locked building, Fox 2 reported.

Police tracked the seller’s information, and she was ticketed.

Fox 2 reported the Greenarches recently lost their home and had other financial setbacks after Thomas Greenarch suffered brain damage in a car crash.

The couple said they found another phone for their daughter on Craigslist and were planning to do the exchange at a designated police station to avoid a similar situation.

Matt Rosenberg is a Tribune-Review assistant multimedia editor. You can contact Matt at 412-320-7937, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.