DA: New York man ran prostitution ring out of parents’ basement | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

DA: New York man ran prostitution ring out of parents’ basement

Associated Press
1074965_web1_1074965-f3aa7b985270429388c8295c6b33c1ad
Newsday
Raymond Rodio lll is arraigned at First District Court, Thursday, April 25, 2019 in Central Islip, N.Y. Rodio pleaded not guilty to sex trafficking and other charges. He allegedly ran a prostitution ring out of his parents Sound Beach home for about four years.

NEW YORK — A Long Island man ran a prostitution ring out of his elderly parents’ sprawling suburban home, enticing women with drugs and locking them in a basement where he forced them to use a bucket instead of a bathroom, prosecutors said Thursday.

Raymond Rodio III, 47, used social media to recruit and advertise the women, got them hooked on heroin or crack cocaine, and forced them to have sex with men in the basement of the home, in Sound Beach, or at nearby motels, Suffolk County District Attorney Tim Sini said.

“This is a dangerous and depraved individual,” Sini said after Rodio’s arraignment. “He kept women locked up in the basement of his parents’ house. He used the basement of his parents’ home as a dungeon.”

Rodio operated the ring for about four years and victimized more than 20 women, Sini said.

Rodio’s parents, who are in their 70s, may have known “something untoward” was going on, but not necessarily that their son was running a prostitution ring, Sini said. They are not charged with a crime.

Rodio pleaded not guilty Thursday to sex trafficking, promoting prostitution and other charges. He remains jailed because he hasn’t posted $1 million cash bail or $2 million bond.

His next court appearance is scheduled for May 21. If convicted of the top charge, he faces up to 25 years in prison.

A message seeking comment was left with his lawyer.

Police uncovered the alleged prostitution ring after a routine traffic stop last August. Officers recognized that a passenger in the car appeared to be a victim of human trafficking, Sini said.

From the outside, Rodio’s parents’ home appears typical of Sound Beach — a quiet, waterfront community about 60 miles east of midtown Manhattan on Long Island’s north shore. Recent photos show a half-dozen American flags in the home’s spacious, meticulously manicured yard. There are birdhouses, wagon wheels and a driveway basketball hoop.

Inside, through a door and down the stairs from an unfinished garage, was a vile, windowless hellscape where Rodio held women for long stretches without access to a shower, a bathroom or the outside world, Sini said.

Rodio’s makeshift brothel featured a bed with a leopard-print comforter, but also walls lined with family portraits and Jesus on a prayer card, Sini said. There were shelves full of lotions, a bottle of chocolate syrup and “all sorts of items that one could suspect were used in sex acts,” Sini said.

“It’s disgusting,” he said.

In recruiting women, Sini said, Rodio targeted women who appeared to have drug dependence or who were somehow otherwise vulnerable. He would initially supply them with drugs for free so they would be dependent on him, the prosecutor said. Then, after setting them up with clients, he’d give them heroin or crack to impair their judgment, Sini said.

Rodio would use the money the clients paid to buy the women more drugs and underwrite his own crack habit, Sini said. If they resisted seeing a client or didn’t fork over enough of the fees, he’d scream at them, Sini said. The flow of drugs made the women indebted to Rodio, Sini said, and the only way they could repay it was by performing sex acts.

“This is a common tactic used by traffickers. They essentially force their victims to become addicted to drugs, then use that addiction — that illness — to keep victims under their control,” Sini said.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.