Delta pilot accused of attempting to fly under the influence of alcohol |

Delta pilot accused of attempting to fly under the influence of alcohol

Steven Adams
Gabriel Schroeder, 37, was charged Friday with attempting to fly an airplane under the influence of alcohol.

A Delta Air Lines pilot is facing charges of attempting to fly an aircraft under the influence of alcohol.

Gabriel Schroeder, 37, was charged Friday over a July 30 incident when Schroeder was due to fly from Minneapolis to San Diego, KARE 11 reported.

According to the complaint, officials were conducting a random screening at Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport when they became suspicious of Schroeder, KARE reported.

He approached the screening area but stopped abruptly before being informed about the screening, according to the complaint. KARE reported that when Schroeder was asked to place his bag on the screening table, he told the TSA officer he was not ready to be screened and left the area.

Officials reportedly discovered that Schroeder then made a 27-second stop at a restroom where an unopened bottle of vodka was found in the trash. KARE reports that Schroeder later said the bottle was his.

Schroeder told detectives that he’d had one beer and three vodka drinks the night before, the Associated Press reports from the complaint.

One of the charges is for a blood-alcohol concentration of .04 or more.

Read more details at KARE 11.

Steven Adams is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Steven at 412-380-5645 or [email protected].

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.