Democrats may fund parts of Trump’s $4.5B border request |

Democrats may fund parts of Trump’s $4.5B border request

Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Congressional Democrats are signaling a willingness to include major elements of President Trump’s $4.5 billion request for humanitarian and security needs on the U.S.-Mexico border in an unrelated, widely backed disaster aid bill that appears to finally be breaking free of a partisan logjam.

Democratic aides said Tuesday that Trump’s request for additional Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention beds is off the table, but that Democrats are willing to fund care for more than 360,000 migrants apprehended since October.

“There are some good parts to it, there are not some good parts to it and we’ll have to separate the wheat from the chaff,” Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said of Trump’s border request. “We’re going to have to go over that with a fine-tooth comb.”

Schumer said Republicans had largely capitulated in a weeks-long fight over aid to Puerto Rico.

“They realized that they are not going to be able to get a good bill done without treating Puerto Rico fairly,” Schumer said.

Trump has opposed additional aid to the U.S. island territory, claiming it has gotten plenty of money already to deal with devastation wrought by back-to-back hurricanes in 2017. He has also feuded with the island’s Democratic officials.

The disaster legislation has been held up in the Senate amid a fight between Trump and Democrats over aid to Puerto Rico. Trump is feuding with Democratic officials on the island and falsely claims that Puerto Rico has already received $91 billion in aid. Pressure from Trump’s GOP allies, particularly southern Republicans seeking aid for hurricane-slammed farmers, appears to have eroded his opposition to additional aid to the island.

“We’re this close,” said Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., holding his thumb and index finger about two inches apart.

But Shelby’s demand to boost Army Corps of Engineers harbor dredging efforts by liberalizing the budget rules for spending out of a dedicated harbor maintenance fund have run into major opposition from House Republicans and the White House. The Port of Mobile in Shelby’s state would be a major beneficiary of the change.

The addition of border funding to the long-sought hurricane and flood aid measure — which ballooned to $19.1 billion during a House floor debate on Friday — adds a major, tricky element to the already overdue disaster bill. Democrats are particularly agreeable to Trump’s $2.8 billion request to house and care for Central American migrants that are seeking asylum from violence in their home countries of Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador, but the details are nettlesome.

The goal is to reach a House-Senate agreement that could finally speed the bill through the Senate, where Democrats upset over aid to Puerto Rico filibustered a GOP plan last month. The House would then vote to send the legislation to Trump for his signature.

Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said he’s getting tired of the holdups over disaster aid and said it’s past time for the Senate to act.

“I’m not going to be sending members of either party home to these storm- and flood-ravaged states without at least some action, preferably a deal that the president will sign,” McConnell said.

The aides spoke on condition of anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak publicly about negotiations.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.