Diocese: Former bishop in West Virginia used sexual innuendo toward subordinates | TribLIVE.com

Diocese: Former bishop in West Virginia used sexual innuendo toward subordinates

Associated Press
Incoming bishop of the Wheeling-Charleston diocese, W.Va, Michael Bransfield in his new office, in Wheeling, W.Va on Feb. 21, 2005. West Virginia’s Roman Catholic diocese has released the names of nine more priests who it said have been credibly accused of child sexual abuse.
Baltimore Archbishop William Lori leads a funeral Mass in Baltimore. On Wednesday, June 5, 2019, Lori released a report on an investigation into former Roman Catholic Bishop Michael Bransfield, in West Virginia, that found a “consistent pattern” of sexual innuendo and suggestive comments and actions toward subordinates.

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — An investigation into a former Roman Catholic bishop in West Virginia found a “consistent pattern” of sexual innuendo and suggestive comments and actions toward subordinates, the head of the Wheeling-Charleston Diocese said Wednesday.

The investigation involved claims against ex-Bishop Michael Bransfield, who resigned last year. A team of investigators determined the sexual harassment accusations against Bransfield were credible, said Wheeling-Charleston Diocese Archbishop William Lori, who released the report.

It found no conclusive evidence that Bransfield engaged in any sexual misconduct involving minors, he said.

The investigation also determined Bransfield misused church funds for his own benefit, Lori said.

No one responded to a telephone message left at a phone number listed for Bransfield. He also had been implicated in a 2012 case involving Philadelphia priests accused of sexual abuse, but he denied abusing anyone in that case.

“I am deeply pained by and sorry for the harm that the former bishop caused to those he was charged with shepherding,” Lori said in a letter released by the diocese. “There is no excuse, nor adequate explanation, that will satisfy the troubling question of how his behavior was allowed to continue for as long as it did without the accountability that we must require of those who have been entrusted with so much.”

According to the investigation, Bransfield also misused church funds, spending them on dining, liquor, gifts, personal travel and luxury items. The full amount was not disclosed, but Lori said he himself had received a total of $7,500 in financial gifts from Bransfield.

The archbishop said he has returned all of the money to the diocese “in light of what I have come to learn of Bishop Bransfield’s handling of diocesan finances,” and has asked that it be donated to Catholic Charities.

In addition, Bransfield made expensive renovations to his private residences in Wheeling and Charleston, along with his intended retirement residence, Lori said.

The team of investigators comprised five lay investigators, both Catholic and non-Catholic, Lori said. The completed investigation has been sent to the Holy See for final judgment.

Catholic Church officials in March imposed ministerial restrictions on Bransfield, who resigned in September after serving 14 years as the diocese’s bishop. The Vatican appointed Lori, the archbishop of Baltimore, to take over.

West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey filed a lawsuit in March accusing the diocese and Bransfield of knowingly employing pedophiles and failing to conduct adequate background checks on camp and school workers.

In a statement Wednesday, Morrisey called for the release of the diocese’s full investigation.

Last month the diocese released the names of additional priests who have been credibly accused of child sexual abuse, bringing to 40 the number of accused priests or deacons who served in West Virginia.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.