Earthquakes shake up Yucca Mountain nuke dump talk in Nevada | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Earthquakes shake up Yucca Mountain nuke dump talk in Nevada

Associated Press
1409474_web1_1409474-586eab5fbb1044f69929c70a5861531b
FILE - In this July 14, 2018, file photo, a sign warns of a falling danger on the crest of Yucca Mountain during a congressional tour near Mercury, Nev. Recent California earthquakes that rattled Las Vegas have shaken up arguments by proponents and opponents of a stalled federal plan to entomb nuclear waste beneath a long-studied former volcanic ridge in southern Nevada. The Las Vegas Review-Journal reports that Wyoming Republican Sen. John Barrasso said this week his legislation to jumpstart the process to open Yucca Mountain is based on studies that take seismic activity into account. Nevada officials disagree. (AP Photo/John Locher, File)
1409474_web1_1409474-df1055be21a540efb28f639e3ed716e7
FILE - In this April 9, 2015, file photo, people walk into the south portal of Yucca Mountain during a congressional tour of the proposed radioactive waste dump near Mercury, Nev., 90 miles northwest of Las Vegas. Recent California earthquakes that rattled Las Vegas have shaken up arguments by proponents and opponents of a stalled federal plan to entomb nuclear waste beneath a long-studied former volcanic ridge in southern Nevada. The Las Vegas Review-Journal reports that Wyoming Republican Sen. John Barrasso said this week his legislation to jumpstart the process to open Yucca Mountain is based on studies that take seismic activity into account. Nevada officials disagree. (AP Photo/John Locher, File)
1409474_web1_1409474-28e9f12b6bb7445d8fc8f08503bfc705
FILE - In this Oct. 3, 2018, file photo, Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., heads to the Senate floor in Washington. Recent California earthquakes that rattled Las Vegas have shaken up arguments by proponents and opponents of a stalled federal plan to entomb nuclear waste beneath a long-studied former volcanic ridge in southern Nevada. The Las Vegas Review-Journal reports that Wyoming Republican Sen. John Barrasso said this week his legislation to jumpstart the process to open Yucca Mountain is based on studies that take seismic activity into account. Nevada officials disagree. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

LAS VEGAS — Recent California earthquakes that rattled Las Vegas have shaken up arguments on both sides of a stalled federal plan to entomb nuclear waste beneath a long-studied site in southern Nevada.

Wyoming Republican Sen. John Barrasso said this week his legislation to jump-start the process to open the Yucca Mountain project is based on studies that take seismic activity into account, the Las Vegas Review-Journal reported .

Spent nuclear reactor fuel is currently stored at 121 sites in 35 states, and Barrasso, chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, said the earthquakes showed the need to move spent radioactive waste from places where it is currently stored above ground to a more secure repository.

“This doesn’t change my view,” Barrasso said. “We need to find a permanent location for the storage of nuclear waste. I think it’s much safer in Yucca Mountain than in a hundred different locations.”

Nevada officials disagree, and the 6.4 magnitude and 7.1 magnitude tremors over the July Fourth holiday appeared to have bolstered arguments by opponents of the radioactive waste repository.

U.S. Rep. Dina Titus, a Democrat from Las Vegas and a longtime Yucca Mountain storage foe, immediately labeled the second shake “yet another reminder of how dangerous it would be to make Nevada the dumping ground for the nation’s nuclear waste.”

Democratic U.S. Sen. Jacky Rosen said the temblors “highlight the very real dangers” the state would face with nuclear waste storage.

U.S. Rep. Steven Horsford, a Democrat whose congressional district includes Yucca Mountain and North Las Vegas, cited a state tally of 621 seismic events greater than magnitude 2.5 within a 50-mile radius of Yucca Mountain during the past 43 years.

“Earthquakes can be dangerous enough in their own right, adding the possibility of a nuclear waste spill in the aftermath is not a risk I am willing to take,” Horsford told the Review-Journal.

Yucca Mountain is about 90 miles northwest of the Las Vegas Strip and 108 miles east of Ridgecrest, California, where the Fourth of July earthquakes originated. It was designated by Congress in 1987 as the site for the nation’s nuclear waste.

The project was shelved in 2010 under pressure from then-Senate Democratic Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada and President Barack Obama. They said nuclear waste should be stored in a state that wants it.

A recent state-by-state ranking by the U.S. Geological Survey showed Nevada fourth in seismic activity, behind Alaska, Wyoming and Oklahoma, and just ahead of California.

Horsford, Titus and Rep. Susie Lee, a Democrat, were instrumental lobbying colleagues to vote against a spending bill to continue the process to build Yucca Mountain.

Republican Congressman Mark Amodei, the only lawmaker from Nevada on the House Appropriations Committee, voted against that legislation, producing a bipartisan defeat and a large hurdle for the Trump administration and proponents to revive the legal process to develop the Nevada repository next fiscal year.

The Department of Energy did not respond to Review-Journal requests for information on earthquake damage at the Yucca Mountain site and tunnels, following the most recent earthquakes.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.