Elite service members compete for ‘Best Ranger’ | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Elite service members compete for ‘Best Ranger’

1080041_web1_1079730-6a130febc8654bffafdbf02be8011acc
AP
Army Capt. Michael Rose of the 101th Airborne crawls under barbed wire strung across muddy water on the Melvesti course during the Best Ranger competition Friday, April 12, 2019, at Fort Benning, Ga. Rose and his teammate, Capt. John Bergman, background, won the event. Over 100 elite members of the U.S. military spent 60 grueling hours competing as two-member teams for the Best Ranger title.
1080041_web1_1079730-0c16187ff6704d7c9beae6d981197197
AP
A Ranger swings from monkey bars as he makes his way over a water obstacle on the Melvesti course during the Best Ranger competition Friday, April 12, 2019, in Fort Benning, Ga.
1080041_web1_1079730-5c2c7c5169104f6cb2c846c8bb85924f
AP
Competitors begin the Best Ranger competition with a group run Friday, April 12, 2019, at Fort Benning, Ga.
1080041_web1_1079730-6b82c8ed4f1f4162bac6edd71ed4339c
AP
A participant climbs a rope on the Melvesti obstacle course during the Best Ranger competition Friday, April 12, 2019, at Fort Benning, Ga.
1080041_web1_1079730-8d4f4b8c90304e25b5fbb5f0586f47bc
AP
An Army Ranger crawls across a rope stretched over Victory Pond during the combat water skills portion of the Best Ranger competition Sunday, April 14, 2019, in Fort Benning, Ga. During the event competitors must walk across a narrow beam to the rope touch a Ranger Tab in the middle and drop 35 feet into the water.
1080041_web1_1079730-f17dd0709751469d8a5b4d8da6f235e6
AP
U.S. Army Capt. Michael Rose, of the 101th Airborne, emerges from muddy water after crawling under barbed wire on the Melvesti course during the Best Ranger Friday, April 12, 2019, at Fort Benning, Ga. Rose and his partner Capt. John Bergman, background, won the event.

FORT BENNING, Ga. — There’s tough, there’s Army Ranger tough and then there’s the toughest of the tough, the handful named Best Ranger.

Earlier this month, 106 elite members of the U.S. military spent 60 grueling hours competing as two-member teams for the Best Ranger title. Sleep-deprived and sometimes soaking wet and loaded down with gear, they marched, ran, swam, rappelled and swung hand over hand on ropes across a wilderness area at Fort Benning in western Georgia while firing rifles and machine guns, performing simulated combat rescues, navigating at night and tackling other daunting, back-to-back challenges.

In the end, Capts. John Bergman and Michael Rose of the Army’s 101st Airborne Division crossed the finish line with rifles raised over their heads — Rose for his third time winning the endurance challenge and Bergman for his second.

Fort Benning, host of the annual competition, is home to the Army’s elite 75th Ranger Regiment as well as the demanding Army Ranger School. Just to become a Ranger entails some of the Army’s toughest training in a 61-day course that weeds out roughly half of those who enter.

Rose, 28, from Roswell, Georgia, was among the soldiers who didn’t graduate from Ranger training on his first try. They call it being “recycled.”

Undaunted, he tried again, passed and returned less than a year later with Bergman to compete for Best Ranger. Rose said he wanted to prove that a soldier can spring back into fighting form just months after completing Ranger training.

“We managed to win,” he said.

The Best Ranger Competition began in 1982 as a contest reserved for Army troops serving in elite special operations units. It aims to put “extreme demands on each buddy team’s physical, mental, technical and tactical skills as Rangers.”

Changes over more than three decades have opened up the competition to others across all branches of the U.S. military who meet Ranger standards.

This year’s competition kicked off before sunrise April 12 with a 5 mile (8 kilometer) run, an obstacle course, a challenge carrying a weighted down stretcher, a swim, a run wearing body armor, an urban assault course, a shooting test at a firing range and a nighttime foot march.

And that was just the first day out of three.

The next day saw the teams narrowed by half. Competitors tested their skills at climbing and rappelling off towers, as well as rescuing and treating an injured comrade from a downed helicopter. After dark they were airlifted into the mountains to compete in wilderness navigation.

Some events were canceled in the final round on the third day as heavy thunderstorms with a chance of tornadoes moved into the Fort Benning area. Teams were still able to face off in a 2 mile (3.2 kilometer) run dotted with barbed wire and other obstacles, plus a combat water skills challenge involving tower climbing, crawling along a rope and zip-lining into a pond.

In a telephone interview the day after it all ended, the two winners said they had been training for months, building up to where they were going 100 miles a week on foot, running or marching, plus weightlifting. Their military units gave them plenty of leeway. So did the families of the two young fathers.

“The families have a lot of sacrifices as well,” said Bergman.

Rose said his inspiration to keep competing comes from “just representing our unit as best we can and kind of inspiring younger soldiers and showing ‘em what we’re capable of — what the Rangers are capable of over the course of three days.”

Bergman, 29, who grew up in Lawrence, Kansas, added that as they prepare to become company commanders, both officers want to instill that message in the soldiers under their charge: “No matter what you achieve, there’s always something else greater that you can become.”

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.