Embattled Massachusetts mayor charged with extorting pot companies | TribLIVE.com

Embattled Massachusetts mayor charged with extorting pot companies

Associated Press
Dave Souza | The Herald News of Fall River via AP
Mayor Jasiel Correia speaks about his indictment during a news conference in 2018 in Fall River, Mass.

BOSTON — A Massachusetts mayor already accused of stealing investor funds to bankroll a lavish lifestyle was arrested Friday on charges he conspired to extort hundreds of thousands of dollars from marijuana companies, the FBI said.

Fall River Mayor Jasiel Correia’s chief of staff has been arrested on similar charges, according to a tweet from the bureau’s Boston office. Two others are also charged in the case.

A message seeking comment was left for Correia’s attorney.

Correia, 27, became the old mill city’s youngest mayor when he was elected at age 23 after serving on the city council. He has remained in office despite efforts to force him out amid his legal troubles.

Correia pleaded not guilty last October to a 13-count indictment charging him with defrauding investors and filing false tax returns.

Prosecutors say Correia collected more than $360,000 from investors to develop an app that was supposed to help businesses connect with consumers.

Instead, he allegedly spent more than $230,000 of the seed money to bankroll a lavish lifestyle, including jewelry, designer clothing and a Mercedes. He is also accused of using the money to finance his political campaign and make charitable donations.

A trial on those federal charges is slated to begin Feb. 24.

Authorities have scheduled a news conference Friday to discuss the latest charges.

In a strange turn of events this year, Correia was recalled by voters and then promptly reelected on the same night in March.

He’s among three mayoral candidates in a primary election scheduled for Sept. 17.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.