Environmentalists, tribes blast Utah national monument plan | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Environmentalists, tribes blast Utah national monument plan

Associated Press
1466600_web1_1466600-7d64b70fa16f4644ad894471630bb646
This May 8, 2017, file photo, shows Arch Canyon within Bears Ears National Monument in Utah. The Bears Ears National Monument covers 315 square miles (816 square kilometers) of southeastern Utah lands considered sacred to Native Americans that are home to ancient cliff dwellings and other artifacts. President Barack Obama created the monument in 2016, and President Donald Trump downsized it a year later. (Francisco Kjolseth/The Salt Lake Tribune via AP, File)
1466600_web1_1466600-3b0686e58b5b420aa251a19d7ca05eeb
This July 15, 2016, file photo, U.S. The “Moonhouse” in McLoyd Canyon, near Blanding, Utah, is shown during U.S. Interior Secretary Sally Jewell tour. The U.S. government is unveiling its final management plan for the Bears Ears National Monument on tribal lands home to ancient cliff dwellings and other artifacts in Utah that was significantly downsized by President Donald Trump. Conservation groups, tribes and an outdoor retail company have sued challenging the downsizing. (AP Photo/Rick Bowmer, File)
1466600_web1_1466600-e40270e1110245b29d9527d7d662a076
In this Monday, Dec. 4, 2017, file photo, President Donald Trump holds up a signed proclamation to shrink the size of Bears Ears and Grand Staircase Escalante national monuments, at the Utah State Capitol, in Salt Lake City. The U.S. government is unveiling its final management plan for the Bears Ears National Monument on tribal lands home to ancient cliff dwellings and other artifacts in Utah that was significantly downsized by President Trump. Conservation groups, tribes and an outdoor retail company have sued challenging the downsizing. (AP Photo/Rick Bowmer, File)
1466600_web1_1466600-f3740caa3b954bbe89184b88b3e2a2ff
In this Dec. 2, 2017, file photo, supporters of the Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments gather during a rally, in Salt Lake City. The U.S. government is unveiling its final management plan for a national monument on tribal lands home to ancient cliff dwellings and other artifacts in Utah that was significantly downsized by President Donald Trump. Conservation groups, tribes and an outdoor retail company have sued challenging the downsizing. (AP Photo/Rick Bowmer, File)
1466600_web1_1466600-abed4e3340ff4afd87681110f988ad74
In this Dec. 2, 2017, photo, a supporter of the Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monuments wears a colorful headdress during a rally against President Trump’s reduction of the two National Monuments in Salt Lake City. The U.S. government is unveiling its final management plan for the national monument on tribal lands home to ancient cliff dwellings and other artifacts in Utah that was significantly downsized by President Donald Trump. Conservation groups, tribes and an outdoor retail company have sued challenging the downsizing. (AP Photo/Rick Bowmer, File)

SALT LAKE CITY — The U.S. government has decided to allow off-road vehicles access to archaeologically sensitive land at a Utah national monument that houses sacred tribal sites under a plan announced Friday.

The Bureau of Land Management’s plan for the Bears Ears National Monument says that certain historic sites most at risk will be off limits, but the agency chose an alternative that closes about 42 square miles to off-road vehicles. That’s far less than a different option that would have closed nearly 184 square miles.

The plan was met by immediate criticism from environmental and tribal organizations, who say it will leave sensitive lands and sites vulnerable to damage.

“It’s like seeing that your grandmother’s house has been robbed,” said Carleton Bowekaty co-chair of the Bears Ears Inter-Tribal Coalition, in a statement. “These lands are sacred to us and they are being destroyed — sometimes inadvertently — by people who don’t understand our culture and way of life.”

The groups also consider the year-plus spent developing the plan a waste of time because lawsuits challenging the downsizing are pending. The final plan comes after the agency took into account public comment following the release of a proposal last summer that laid out the different alternatives.

Bureau of Land Management Utah state director Ed Roberson said in a news release that the plan protects cultural resources while allowing for recreation, keeping most of the monument open for hunting, fishing and target shooting. Roberson noted that no shooting will be allowed near cliff dwellings, petroglyphs and campgrounds.

“These plans will provide a blueprint to protect the awe-inspiring natural and cultural resources that make this monument nationally significant, while enhancing recreational opportunities and ensuring access to traditional uses,” Roberson said in the release.

President Barack Obama created Bears Ears National Monument in 2016 after years of lobbying by Native American groups who asked for more protections on what they consider sacred lands that are home to ancient cliff dwellings and other artifacts.

A year later, President Donald Trump downsized it by about 85% to 315 square miles following a review of 27 national monuments by then-Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke. Trump earned cheers from Republican leaders in Utah.

Gov. Gary Herbert, who supported the downsizing, declined to weigh in on the plan Friday. He said in a statement that his office would be carefully reviewing the plan to ensure it protects artifacts and allows public access.

Trump also downsized Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument in Utah by nearly half. The final management plan for the revised monument is still pending.

Trump said scaling back the two monuments reversed federal overreach. Past presidents have trimmed national monuments 18 times, but there’s never been a court ruling on whether the Antiquities Act also lets them reduce one.

Sen. Tom Udall of New Mexico and Rep. Raul Grijalva of Arizona were among Democrats who blasted the plan as being a waste of time since the lawsuits are pending and called it an example of the Trump administration’s “attack on public lands.” Udall was one 11 senators who urged the government to postpone the management plan until the courts resolved the lawsuits.

The Bears Ears plan’s allowance for using vehicle-dragged chains to clear woodland areas for fire prevention and right of way roads in parts of a popular rock climbing area known as Indian Creek are examples that the plan is ill-conceived, said Heidi McIntosh, managing attorney of Earthjustice’s Rocky Mountains office. The plan doesn’t do much to curtail off-roading either. The organization is among the coalition that sued over Trump’s reduction of the monument.

“This part of southern Utah is really been hammered by off-road vehicle use,” McIntosh said. “It not only damages the land itself, but is also the access point for people who drive around the back country looking for archaeological sites to loot.”

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.