Evidence found, prosecutors seek freeze in Flint water case | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Evidence found, prosecutors seek freeze in Flint water case

Associated Press
1082450_web1_1082450-bdde0afb640c48f4b0ea53962c47a7de
More than 50 Flint residents rally on the five-year anniversary of the Flint water crisis at the Capitol Building on Thursday, April 25, 2019, in Lansing, Mich. (Jake May/MLive.com/The Flint Journal via AP)
1082450_web1_1082450-f6a898a719fe4516a95ce270076ce388
Flint resident R.L. Mitchell prays on the steps of the Capitol Building in Lansing, Mich., at the beginning of a rally on the five-year anniversary of the Flint water crisis on Thursday, April 25, 2019. (Jake May/MLive.com/The Flint Journal via AP)
1082450_web1_1082450-9d6b7a78ec1f45a8aeb3fdba2145bc67
Flint resident Freddie Fisher shouts out “No justice, no peace!” as she joins more than 50 Flint residents who rally on the five-year anniversary of the Flint water crisis at the Capitol Building on Thursday, April 25, 2019, in Lansing, Mich. Fisher said she’s been afraid of interaction with the water, so much to the point that she has to force herself to take a bath to keep clean, but not without its fears of what it could do to her body. She erupted with an impassioned speech asking for politicians to step up and continue to aid the city’s residents until the issue is fully resolved. (Jake May/MLive.com/The Flint Journal via AP)

DETROIT — Prosecutors on Friday asked a judge for a six-month timeout in the criminal case against Michigan’s former health director after finding a “trove of documents” related to the Flint water crisis in the basement of a state building.

The 23 boxes included a file titled “phones/wiped” with the names of eight state employees, prosecutors said.

“Only within the past few weeks did the People learn of a trove of documents and other materials that should have been, but was not, provided to it months or even years ago,” the attorney general’s office said in a court filing.

It’s unclear what connection, if any, the boxes have to former health chief Nick Lyon, who is charged with involuntary manslaughter in an outbreak of Legionnaires’ disease. He’s accused of failing to timely warn the public about the disease while Flint was using water from the Flint River in 2014-15 . The water wasn’t properly treated, which caused lead to leach from old pipes, among other problems.

Lyon has been ordered to trial , but Genesee County Judge Joseph Farah is considering an appeal. He planned to release a decision no later than May 17, more than three months after hearing arguments.

“We were in full overdrive working to get this done,” the judge told The Associated Press.

But prosecutors now want him to suspend the case for six months. Farah said he’ll hold a hearing on May 3.

“We will vigorously oppose it. This is another stall tactic by the prosecution,” said Lyon’s attorney, Chip Chamberlain.

Prosecutors didn’t suddenly stumble upon the documents and computer hard drives. They said they were informed in February by Peter Manning, a division chief in the attorney general’s office, that the boxes “were languishing in the basement of a state-owned building.”

Other attorneys in the office were aware of the records because they were defending state officials in civil lawsuits related to the Flint water scandal, Assistant Attorney General Daniel Ping said.

They indicated that the records were duplicates of what already had been given to prosecutors, but investigators said that wasn’t true, Ping wrote.

The criminal investigation was led by a special prosecutor, Todd Flood, until earlier this year when Dana Nessel, the new attorney general, brought the cases into her office and formed a new team. Flood charged 15 people; so far seven have pleaded no contest to misdemeanors.

This week was the fifth anniversary of Flint’s switch to the Flint River. The city used the river for 18 months until fall 2015.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.