Ex-leader of North Carolina GOP admits to lying to FBI in corruption case | TribLIVE.com

Ex-leader of North Carolina GOP admits to lying to FBI in corruption case

Associated Press
Former North Carolina Republican Party Chairman Robin Hayes is expected to admit in court that he lied to federal agents conducting a bribery investigation of a major political donor.
Former North Carolina Republican Party Chairman Robin Hayes is scheduled to enter a guilty plea on Oct. 2, 2019. A factual basis document prepared as part of the plea agreement and signed by Hayes’ attorney acknowledges that Hayes knew he was making false statements to FBI agents.

CHARLOTTE — The former chairman of North Carolina’s Republican Party admitted Wednesday that he broke the law by lying to federal agents about his role in an alleged effort to bribe the state’s top insurance regulator to help a major GOP donor.

Robin Hayes, 74, pleaded guilty to making a false statement in August 2018 to FBI agents conducting the bribery investigation. Hayes, a former congressman, was initially also charged with conspiracy and bribery. His plea deal included the promise that he would help prosecutors build a case against co-defendants and potentially testify against them.

Prosecutors agreed that Hayes could avoid any time behind bars, but a judge could sentence him to no more than six months in prison. The government agreed to recommend a sentence “at the low end” of that range, along with monetary penalties, prosecutors said.

“Today was a big step forward. Robin looks forward to completing this process and moving ahead,” said Kearns Davis, Hayes’ lawyer. Hayes left the courthouse without speaking to reporters.

In an indictment unsealed in April, prosecutors said Hayes agreed to use the state Republican Party as a conduit for filtering $250,000 to state Insurance Commissioner Mike Causey’s reelection campaign. Prosecutors said Hayes agreed to funnel the money to Causey at the request of insurance magnate Greg Lindberg and an associate. Lindberg proposed moving $250,000 through the party’s coffers to Causey each quarter as part of his plan to provide the insurance regulator with $2 million in contributions for his expected 2020 reelection campaign, prosecutors said.

Hayes initially protested, saying that moving so much money would draw attention, but eventually relented during the conversation, according to the indictment.

“Whatever you all want to do, we’ll do,” Hayes said, according to the indictment. “Alright, I’ll get ‘er done.”

Causey, a Republican, reported the alleged bribe attempt to federal officials and for months helped them gather evidence, prosecutors said.

Lindberg is an insurance and investment firm founder who has been among the state’s top political donors in recent years, giving more than $5 million to state and federal candidates and committees since 2016. He favored Republican causes and politicians , but also gave to Democrats.

Lindberg’s attorneys have asked that charges against him be dismissed, arguing in a in a motion last month he was using his constitutional free-speech rights to support Causey. Lindberg “simply sought a fair and reasonable regulatory examination by a competent and neutral decision-maker” for his company, his lawyers said.

Lindberg and two associates charged with conspiracy to commit honest services wire fraud, bribery, and aiding and abetting are scheduled to go on trial as early as mid-November.

Hayes gave up operational duties as chairman of the North Carolina Republican Party after the charges became public. He had announced just before the indictment was unsealed that he was not seeking reelection to the post.

Hayes, an heir to a textile fortune, represented North Carolina’s 8th District Congressional for a decade beginning in 1999. He was defeated by Democrat Larry Kissell in 2008.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.