Family told to take down Christmas decorations because it’s too soon | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Family told to take down Christmas decorations because it’s too soon

Steven Adams
1942748_web1_ChristmasTree-Green
File

A Texas family is refusing to comply with an order to remove the Christmas display they installed on Nov. 1.

The Simonis family decorated the outside of their home near San Antonio with a snowman, some reindeer and a Santa hanging from a helicopter, reports WOAI News.

On Nov. 4, the neighborhood’s homeowners association, Diamond Association Management & Consulting, sent Nick and Claudia Simonis a notice titled “Maintenance – Holiday Decorations Need To Be Removed,” WOAI reports.

The letter asks the family to “please remove the snowman until closer to the holiday season” but gives them no specific date that ornaments would be allowed.

“I feel kind of heavy, so the earlier we can put out the decorations, the better,” Claudia, who is 8 months pregnant, told WOAI. “Because probably in two more weeks, I’m not going to be able to build all this.”

Nick and Claudia plan to ignore the request.

“We’re not going to do it,” Nick told WOAI. “It’s the Christmas spirit. We’re not going to be forced by the HOA to take it down.”

In fact, WOAI reports that other neighbors have started decorating early as a show of solidarity.

Read more details at WOAI.

Steven Adams is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Steven at 412-380-5645 or [email protected].

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.