Former Dem. candidate admits lying about operating on Pulse survivors | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Former Dem. candidate admits lying about operating on Pulse survivors

Associated Press
1444536_web1_ptr-Pulse-072319
AP
Artwork and signatures cover a fence around the Pulse nightclub on Nov. 30, 2016. The nightclub was the scene of a mass shooting on June 12, 2016 in Orlando, Fla.

ORLANDO, Fla. — A former Democratic candidate for the Florida Legislature acknowledged to state investigators that she lied when she said she was a medical doctor who had removed 77 bullets from 32 victims of the Pulse nightclub shooting in 2016.

A state Department of Health report released last week shows Catherine “Elizabeth” McCarthy told an investigator that she knew what she did was wrong.

The gun-safety forum in March was attended by U.S. Rep. Darren Soto, along with a sheriff and a Pulse survivor.

Earlier this month, McCarthy withdrew from the 2020 Democratic primary for a Florida House seat that covers suburban Orlando. In her withdrawal letter, she cited “professional obligations” as her reason.

Reached by telephone Monday, McCarthy said she couldn’t talk.

Gunman Omar Mateen killed 49 patrons at the gay nightclub.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.