Former HUD contract specialist pleads guilty in bribery scheme |

Former HUD contract specialist pleads guilty in bribery scheme

The Washington Post

WASHINGTON — A former contract specialist for the U.S. Housing and Urban Development agency has pleaded guilty in a federal bribery scheme that involved giving private information on contracts to a Maryland business in exchange for more than $38,000 in money, travel and hotels, and tickets to Washington Redskins and Washington Wizards games.

Authorities said Kevin Jones, 48, of suburban Laurel, Md., was a contract oversight specialist at HUD starting in 1999, with access to bid offers and particular information about businesses.

Jones, along with another former HUD employee and a former employee for a D.C. educational agency, were involved in the scheme with the same Maryland company, according to the office of U.S. Attorney Jessie Liu of the District.

He made his plea Thursday before a judge in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

Prosecutors said that starting in 2010, Jones gave “non-public information” about pending contracts to Charles Thomas, 45, of Lusby, Maryland, who owned a company that offered tech services to the federal and city governments.

In exchange, Thomas gave tickets to sporting events, travel and cash to Jones. The scheme went on for eight years, according to authorities with the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia.

Jones’ information gave Thomas and his company “an unfair competitive advantage” in getting two HUD contracts that were worth more than $4.5 million. Jones personally approved invoices that totaled $3.8 million for work Thomas did on one contract.

Jones received gifts from Thomas and his company that included $13,000 in cash and checks, meals, a camera, a pair of basketball shoes, $6,800 in hotels and travel expenses, $17,000 worth of tickets to Washington Redskins games and three Super Bowls, and $1,700 worth of Washington Wizards tickets.

Another former HUD employee, LaFonda Lewis, also pleaded guilty in January in a similar scheme of giving information to Thomas in exchange for gifts. Lewis, 57, also of Lusby, was a supervisory contract oversight specialist. She is due to be sentenced in March.

Officials said Thomas pleaded guilty last May to several counts of conspiracy and admitted to paying bribes to Jones and Lewis, the two HUD employees, and to Shauntell Harley, an employee at the D.C. State Superintendent of Education office, in return for payments on contracts.

Harley, 49, of Washington, worked as a special education analyst and was terminated from the agency in 2015. She pleaded guilty last spring and was sentenced in July to 56 months in prison for accepting Thomas’ bribes.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.