Former N.Y. Rep. Chris Collins pleads guilty to insider trading |

Former N.Y. Rep. Chris Collins pleads guilty to insider trading

Former U.S. Rep. Chris Collins leaves federal court Tuesday, Oct. 1, 2019, in New York. Collins pleaded guilty Tuesday in an insider trading case, a day after he resigned from Congress and set off a scramble to fill his seat in his Republican-leaning district.

NEW YORK — One of President Donald Trump’s earliest supporters in Congress — former Rep. Chris Collins — pleaded guilty Tuesday to insider trading charges that he had previously dismissed as “a partisan witch hunt.”

“The actions I took are anything but what a model citizen would take. I am embarrassed and dismayed,” Collins said.

The western New York Republican confessed to the scheme involving his son and father of his son’s ex-fiancee in Manhattan Federal Court. Earlier in the day, Collins’ resignation was formally accepted in Congress.

The guilty plea capped a quick downfall for Collins, 69, who won reelection in 2018 to the district covering the suburbs of Buffalo and Rochester despite the federal indictment alleging he shared the inside info on a biotech company during a picnic on the White House lawn. At a previous hearing, Collins expressed confidence he would be elected again in 2020, should he choose to run.

In the courtroom he seemed less self assured.

Collins said the news of the drug trial failure left him “devastated … thinking about the multiple sclerosis patients we would not be able to treat.”

“I was in an emotional state and called my son,” he told the court.

He copped to conspiracy to commit securities fraud and lying to the FBI and could have faced 10 years combined for both counts.

Under the plea deal, though, Collins agreed not appeal a judge’s sentence that falls between between 46 and 57 months.

A special election will be held to fill the seat, one of just six out of 27 in New York held by the GOP.

When he was charged in August 2018, Collins called the case “meritless.” His spokeswoman had said a House Ethics Committee investigation into the shady stock trades was “a partisan witch hunt,” echoing Trump.

Collins, his son Cameron Collins and Stephen Zarsky were accused of illegally dumping shares of a biotech company, Innate Immunotherapeutics. Chris Collins was one of the company’s largest shareholders and sat on its board of directors.

Prosecutors say the congressman was caught on camera at the White House picnic telling Cameron over the phone that a new multiple sclerosis drug had failed a key medical trial. The bad result would send the value of the company plummeting by 92%. By the time the news went public, Cameron Collins and Zarsky had dumped their shares, avoiding losses of $768,000, prosecutors say.

They had faced a trial starting February on charges of securities fraud, wire fraud, false statements and conspiracy.

Collins’ departure from Congress opens up a chance for Democrats to flip Collins’ traditionally red district, and New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo is doing his best to help in that effort, according to a source.

The source, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations, said the governor is looking to schedule the special election for Collins’ seat on April 28, so that it coincides with New York’s presidential primary. The thinking is that this will bolster Democratic turnout and increase the chance of Collins’ upstate district turning blue, the source said.

Speaking on WAMC radio Monday morning, Cuomo signaled he wants to slot the Collins replacement race as soon as possible.

“I don’t believe, legally, I can call it for this November, which would be convenient because people are going to the polls anyway,” Cuomo said. “The question is, when can I do it? But sooner rather than later is my inclination.”

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.