GI Bill, written by Braddock native, marks 75th anniversary |

GI Bill, written by Braddock native, marks 75th anniversary

Patrick Varine
Aimee Obidzinski/University of Pittsburgh
Photos of Harry Colmery in his childhood and during his military service sit on the table of his niece, Jean Colmery Roberts, on June 19, 2019. Colmery wrote the Serviceman’s Readjustment Act of 1944, better known as the GI Bill.
Submitted photo
Harry Colmery, on the left, author of the Serviceman’s Readjustment Act of 1944 (better known as the GI Bill) walks with future President Dwight Eisenhower in a 1952 American Legion Parade in New York City.
Aimee Obidzinski/University of Pittsburgh
Jean Colmery, niece of Harry Colmery, who drafted the G.I. Bill, poses for a photo in her Charleroi home on June 19, 2019, with Pitt Veteran Services Director Aryanna Berringer of Murrysville.
FDR Library
President Franklin D. Roosevelt, seated, signs the Serviceman’s Readjustment Act of 1944. The legislation was written by Braddock native Harry Colmery.

Aryanna Berringer, the newly appointed director of the University of Pittsburgh’s Office of Veterans Services, is one of the millions of veterans whose life has been impacted by the GI Bill, which marked its 75th anniversary on June 22.

“For me, personally, I grew up in poverty. I grew up sometimes not knowing where my next meal would come from,” said Berringer, a Murrysville resident. “When I joined the military, there was part of me knowing that I can get an education when I got out, that now has led me to the position I am in today.”

For that, Berringer has a fellow Pitt graduate and Western Pennsylvania native to thank.

Harry Colmery, a 1916 graduate of the University of Pittsburgh’s School of Law, was born in Braddock and served in World War I as a first lieutenant in the Army Air Service after graduating from law school.

In 1936, after marrying his college sweetheart and settling in Kansas, Colmery served as national commander of the American Legion, advocating for a better future for servicemen and women upon their return home from war.

Part of that advocacy included the first draft of the Serviceman’s Readjustment Act of 1944 — the original GI Bill of Rights — which he wrote by hand on stationery from Washington, D.C.’s Mayflower Hotel.

“Harry called me after he had written all night for the GI Bill. He told me he used seven pens, I think,” said his niece Jean Colmery Roberts, 99, who now lives in Charleroi.

“He cared so much for his fellow man,” Roberts said. “He was a bright boy. He was dedicated, a hard worker, a deep thinker and a humble person in many respects.”

More than eight million World War II veterans received an education through the GI Bill.

Upon returning home from service in World War I, Colmery began a career as an attorney in Topeka, Kan., even arguing two cases before the U.S. Supreme Court.

On the anniversary of the bill’s signing in 2016, Colmery Memorial Plaza in Topeka was dedicated. It includes a statue of Colmery saluting World War II service members.

On June 19, Pitt Law School Dean Amy Wildermuth and Berringer visited Roberts to present her with a military “Challenge” coin and honor her uncle.

Celebrating the 75th Anniversary of the GI Bill, Thanks to Pitt Law from University of Pittsburgh on Vimeo.

“He would be pleased, but he wouldn’t want all of this. No, no,” said Roberts. “He was humble. He did everything in a very quiet way, and accomplished so much. You never knew what was going on in the background.”

Berringer said Colmery’s legacy is well worth trumpeting.

“It’s one of those things that can change the trajectory of the life of somebody like me,” she said. “I was able to break the cycle of poverty, all due to the GI Bill.”

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.