ShareThis Page
Great horned owl battles red-tailed hawk over nest, guess who wins? |

Great horned owl battles red-tailed hawk over nest, guess who wins?

Mary Ann Thomas

It’s not surprising which bird won the battle over a nest in San Francisco earlier this month as evidenced by live webcam footage showing the clash between a red-tailed hawk and a great horned owl.

The “Presidio Raptor Cam” documented a red-tailed hawk family last year successfully raising their young in a nest high in a eucalyptus tree, according to the San Francisco Examiner. The hawks left the nest as they usually do after the young fledged.

However, this year, Great-horned owls, which nest earlier than the hawks, took over the nest and are currently incubating two eggs, according to the Examiner.

But one of the hawks returned home recently and tried to reclaim its nest — unsuccessfully.

The webcam caught all of the action of the battle for possession of the nest on Feb. 2, according to a report from Fox 13 News in San Francisco.


Mary Ann Thomas is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Mary at 724-226-4691, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Courtesy of Presidio Raptor Cam
A hawk tries to reclaim its nest from a great-horned owl in San Francisco.
Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.