Hong Kong protesters resort to medieval weapons | TribLIVE.com

Hong Kong protesters resort to medieval weapons

Associated Press
In this Wednesday, Nov. 13, 2019, file photo, students with their homemade gears take their position outside the Chinese University of Hong Kong, in Hong Kong.
In this Thursday, Nov. 14, 2019, photo, protesters throw Molotov cocktails at the toll booth for the Cross Harbor Tunnel near the the Hong Kong Polytechnic University campus in Hong Kong in Hong Kong.
In this Tuesday, Nov. 12, 2019, file photo, a student holds a molotov cocktail during clashes at the Chinese University in Hong Kong.
In this Wednesday, Nov. 13, 2019, file photo, students make molotov cocktails at the Chinese University in Hong Kong.
In this Thursday, Nov. 14, 2019, file photo, protesters practice firing bows and arrows at Hong Kong Polytechnic University in Hong Kong.
In this Wednesday, Nov. 13, 2019, file photo, with orange javelins behind them, protesters look out from a raised platform on a barricaded bridge which leads into the Chinese University of Hong Kong, in Hong Kong.

HONG KONG — Protesters, including student, who barricaded themselves inside Hong Kong’s universities have tried to turn the campuses into armed camps, resorting to medieval weapons to stop police from entering the grounds.

Their weapons include bows and arrows, catapults and hundreds of gasoline bombs stacked up to ramparts — often built by the students.

The police described many of the devices as lethal weapons and warned protesters they will be prosecuted if they are caught using them.

Protesters said they need the weapons to protect the campuses from police using tear gas, pepper spray and water cannons.

Now in their sixth month, the anti-government protests have grown increasingly violent even as they have shrunk in size, often causing chaos in the streets of the city of 7.5 million people.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.