Housing Secretary Ben Carson confuses real-estate term with an Oreo | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Housing Secretary Ben Carson confuses real-estate term with an Oreo

Ben Carson might do more for Oreo cookie sales than “Game of Thrones” ever did.

But Carson, the housing secretary under President Trump, did not offer the promotion intentionally.

On Tuesday, Carson appeared to think that a California Democrat was questioning him about the cookies during his congressional testimony, when she was actually asking him about foreclosure properties.

Rep. Katie Porter was attempting to ask Carson about disparities in REO rates. The term refers to property owned by a bank or a lender after it’s been foreclosed.

“I would also like to ask you to get back to me, if you don’t mind, to explain the disparity in REO rates. Do you know what an REO is?” asked the freshman congresswoman.

“An Oreo?” replied Carson.

“REO,” Porter repeated. “No, not an Oreo. An R-E-O.”

“Real estate?” Carson, a retired neurosurgeon, suggested. Then Porter to asked him what the “O” meant, to which Carson answered, “organization.”

Porter replied, “Owned, real estate owned. That’s what happens when a property goes to foreclosure, we call it an R-E-O.”

Once the hearing ended, Carson tweeted a photo of a package of Oreos next to a note thanking Porter for participating in the hearing, with the caption: “OH, REO! Thanks, @RepKatiePorter. Enjoying a few post-hearing snacks. Sending some your way!”

Once it heard of the hearing, Oreo’s social team got in the act, but thought better of it and took down the tweet.

One could only think Carson wished the hearing would stop after the first exchange.


1190029_web1_AP19141549092145
1190029_web1_AP19141549139508
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.