Internet domain battle pits Amazon against the Amazon |

Internet domain battle pits Amazon against the Amazon

Deb Erdley

Call this battle Amazon versus the Amazon.

The New York Times reported Friday that the giant Internet retailer’s seven-year battle with eight Amazon basin countries over the domain name .amazon has come down to the wire.

Amazon has until Sunday to submit a new proposal to the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or ICANN, that would appease the claims of eight South American countries that want to block the company’s proposal.

Brazil, Peru, Columbia, Ecuador, Bolivia, Venezuela, Guyana and Suriname aren’t bidding for the name, but claim the retailer’s use could infringe upon its cultural and natural heritage. They want the name protected and to ensure they have a voice in its use.

The issue comes down to one of ICANN’s rules that require applicants for geographic names obtain local government approval.

“It’s not the classic issue of two different parties applying for the same name,” said Rodrigo de la Parra, the regional vice president for Latin America and the Caribbean at ICANN, in the Times article.

Wonder if Amazon has thought of offering free Prime throughout the Amazon basin?

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 724-850-1209, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.