ShareThis Page
IRS millionaire audits decline | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

IRS millionaire audits decline

Deb Erdley
| Thursday, March 7, 2019 5:24 p.m
849561_web1_WEB-tax-form

Here’s a little good news for millionaires worried about the ramifications of tax time as April 15 draws ever nearer: your chances of being audited have decreased significantly in recent years.

Government records show the number of audits of America’s wealthiest taxpayers — those filing returns for $1 million or more — declined from a peak of 39,753 in 2015 to 16,305 in 2018, TRAC, the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University, reported Thursday.

“Billions of dollars are arguably at stake, as is American faith in the fairness of our federal tax system,” TRAC researchers wrote. They noted that the federal government turned up an extra $5.1 billion in unpaid taxes in 2010 when the IRS audited 32,494 millionaire tax returns.

The folks at TRAC attributed the downturn in audits to years of budget cutbacks at the IRS, where staffing levels were reduced by 22 percent between 2010 and 2018.

Find out more about how that has resulted in fewer audits of giant corporations and even fewer criminal prosecutions against the worst offenders in the TRAC report.

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 412-320-7996, derdley@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.