Jeffrey Epstein accusers denied compensation in victims’ rights case | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Jeffrey Epstein accusers denied compensation in victims’ rights case

Associated Press
1682050_web1_1682050-bde7d0989b0f440b9a18e0ea049730f6
AP
Courtney Wild (left) joined by her attorney Brad Edwards, reads a statement July 16, 2019 during a news conference in New York calling on victims of Jeffrey Epstein to contact the FBI or lawyers with their information.

A group of women who say they were sexually abused by Jeffrey Epstein suffered a setback Monday in their decade-long legal fight over a plea deal that allowed the financier to avoid a lengthy prison term.

A federal judge in West Palm Beach, Florida, ruled that the women were not entitled to compensation from the U.S. Justice Department, even though prosecutors violated their rights by failing to consult them about the 2008 deal to end a federal probe that could have landed Epstein in prison for life.

“In the end they are not receiving much, if any, of the relief they sought,” U.S. District Judge Kenneth Marra wrote.

One of the women’s attorneys, Paul Cassell, said they are considering an appeal.

“We are disappointed that no remedy will be awarded for the proven violation of the victims’ rights that the government caused in this case,” he said.

Several of Epstein’s victims sued the Justice Department in 2008 over their handling of his plea negotiations, in which his victims were purposely kept in the dark by state and federal prosecutors in South Florida.

They kept the legal case alive for years, even after Epstein finished serving his 13-month jail term, paid financial settlements to victims and registered as a sex offender, arguing that prosecutors had violated the federal Crime Victims’ Rights Act.

The drawn-out litigation ultimately fueled a Miami Herald investigation into the plea negotiations, which in turn led to a new wave of public outrage over perceived favorable treatment for Epstein, who once counted Presidents Donald Trump and Bill Clinton as friends.

Federal prosecutors in New York revived the case, arguing they weren’t bound by the original deal, and charged Epstein with sex trafficking.

Former Miami U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, who oversaw the plea deal, stepped down as U.S. labor secretary amid the renewed scrutiny.

And Marra ruled in February that prosecutors had violated the rights of dozens of Epstein accusers by secretly reaching a nonprosecution agreement that allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state charges.

Despite those findings, Marra said in his decision Monday, the Crime Victims’ Rights Act did not authorize an award of restitution to the women.

He also said they weren’t entitled to recover attorney’s fees from the government, or have the original plea bargain thrown out, or to get other things they’d asked for, including records related to the investigation and a personal meeting with Acosta.

But he said they could “take solace” in the national attention their lawsuit brought to “the importance of victims in the criminal justice system.”

The civil case “likely played some role,” he said, in the federal sex trafficking charges brought against Epstein this summer.

“It has also resulted in the United States Department of Justice acknowledging its shortcomings in dealing with crime victims, and its promise to better train its prosecutors regarding the rights of victims under the CVRA in the future,” Marra wrote in the 15-page ruling.

The U.S. attorney’s office in Miami did not immediately return a message seeking comment.

Epstein killed himself in August in the federal jail in New York where he was awaiting trial.

The U.S. attorney general, William Barr, has vowed to bring to justice anyone who helped Epstein recruit underage women for sex acts.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.