ShareThis Page
Jerome Corsi retracts and apologizes for story promoting Seth Rich conspiracy theory | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Jerome Corsi retracts and apologizes for story promoting Seth Rich conspiracy theory

834325_web1_im-36545
Jerome Corsi

Conservative author Jerome Corsi on Monday apologized for writing an article in which he falsely alleged that Seth Rich, a Democratic National Committee staffer who was killed in 2016, and his brother Aaron had leaked thousands of emails to the anti-secrecy organization WikiLeaks.

Corsi said in a statement that the allegations he made in his article, which was posted on the Infowars website last March, “were not based upon any independent factual knowledge” about the Rich brothers.

He pointed to a now-retracted Washington Times column by a retired Navy admiral on which the article was based.

“It was not Dr. Corsi’s intent to rely upon inaccurate information, or to cause any suffering to Mr. Rich’s family. To that end, Dr. Corsi retracts the article and apologizes to the Rich family,” the statement reads.

The apology came after Aaron Rich’s legal team requested a retraction of the conservative author’s article. It represents a victory for the Rich family, which has been battling the conspiracy theory and seeking to hold accountable those who have promoted it.

Last year, a federal judge dismissed a lawsuit by Rich’s parents, Joel and Mary Rich, against Fox News over a May 2017 story that falsely claimed investigators had evidence that Seth Rich had leaked DNC emails to WikiLeaks. There is no evidence that Rich was the source of the leak; the U.S. intelligence community has concluded that Russia was responsible for the DNC hack and email dump.

The Riches are appealing the decision.

Aaron Rich had also filed a lawsuit against The Washington Times over its publication of the column by retired Adm. James Lyons. The newspaper’s apology and retraction of the article came as part of a settlement last year.

Attorney Michael Gottlieb, who represents Aaron Rich, pledged on Monday to “continue our fight on Aaron’s behalf until justice is served on each of the dwindling proponents of this discredited fantasy.”

“Today is a significant step towards accountability for the unconscionable conspiracy theory targeting our client, Aaron Rich,” Gottlieb said in a statement. “Today, Infowars and Dr. Jerome Corsi joined the Washington Times in admitting that the conspiracy theory about Aaron’s purported involvement in the unlawful transfer of DNC documents to Wikileaks is, and always has been, utterly baseless.”

District of Columbia police believe the unsolved murder of 27-year-old Seth Rich was the result of a botched robbery.

Yet far-right websites and conservative news outlets promoted the theory that Rich was killed as punishment for leaking the DNC emails during the 2016 campaign. Some supporters of President Trump embraced the theory as it provided a counter-argument to allegations that Trump’s campaign had colluded with Russia in an effort to thwart Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s chances of winning the White House.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.