Judge releases list of 700 requests for Mueller warrants, records | TribLIVE.com

Judge releases list of 700 requests for Mueller warrants, records

The Washington Post
Special counsel Robert Mueller speaks at the Department of Justice Wednesday, May 29, 2019, in Washington, about the Russia investigation.

WASHINGTON — A federal judge Monday released a bare-bones list of nearly 700 requests by special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation for search warrants and court-authorized orders to scoop up information about individuals’ telephone, email and social media activity from providers such as Verizon, Google and Facebook.

The investigative requests span a period from July 7, 2017, when a special federal grand jury was first empaneled in Washington to work with Mueller’s probe of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election to as recently as March 15, a week before the probe’s conclusion, although most activity ended in September 2018.

U.S. prosecutors agreed to release “the vast majority” of information sought, but they obtained an unknown number of redactions to protect the integrity of ongoing investigations.

The disclosure does not identify who or what activity was under criminal investigation or whether charges resulted.

The disclosure, ordered by Beryl Howell, chief judge of the U.S. District Court in Washington, came at the request of CNN and its journalist Katelyn Polantz, and continues a slow trickle of court-ordered disclosures of sealed or otherwise previously redacted information since Mueller submitted his long-awaited report to Attorney General William Barr on March 22.

Mueller stated without elaboration in his report that his office issued more than 2,800 subpoenas under the auspices of the grand jury, executed nearly 500 search-and-seizure warrants; obtained more than 230 orders for stored communications records and obtained almost 50 orders for call and message tracing.

CNN asked Howell to publicly release as much information as possible for “all non-grand jury subpoena matters” and warrant applications, including, at a minimum, case numbers, filing dates and identifying case captions.

Almost all the applications remain under seal, but the information disclosed Monday shows that Mueller prosecutors filed 21 applications to trace the time, date, duration and source of calls, emails, instant messages or other social network communications, applications that, including extensions, resulted in 49 total orders.

The court created 179 dockets for requests by the special counsel’s office to compel disclosure of individuals’ stored communications — data that can include subscriber information, transaction logs and contact lists, as well the contents of opened emails or communications or unopened ones more than six months old.

And the court listed 499 dockets created for Mueller requests for physical and electronic search warrants, including the contents of recent emails, text messages, social media posts and YouTube videos.

In approving the new limited release, Howell wrote, “As CNN notes, disclosing this information accords with this Court’s practice of publishing appropriately limited information about sealed dockets, and with the common law right” of access to information about secret requests by law enforcement to trace individuals’ messages, track their movements or establish their patterns of conduct or relationships using browsing logs, communications history and records of devices used and websites accessed.

The dockets that were disclosed show that prosecutors filed two last applications for warrants for information on Facebook accounts on March 11 and 15, one week before the investigation ended, and filed to search electronic devices associated with one individual on Feb. 13, without identifying the owners.

They filed two final requests for stored communications on Feb. 21 and March 7, with the March 7 request aimed at Google and 1&1 Mail & Media.

Previously, federal judges have separately unsealed certain search warrants obtained by the government in the investigations of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort and Trump’s former personal attorney, Michael Cohen, while other requests are pending. Requests have come from news organizations including CNN, The Washington Post, the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press and others.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.