Karaoke singer hospitalized with collapsed lung after hitting high notes | TribLIVE.com

Karaoke singer hospitalized with collapsed lung after hitting high notes

Chris Pastrick

He sang his heart out. And his lung.

A Chinese man ended up in the hospital with a collapsed lung after a marathon karaoke session, the South China Morning Post reports.

In an interview with the video site PearVideo, the 65-year-old, mentioned only by his surname Wang, said after singing 10 straight high-pitched songs he began to experience chest pains.

“I was very excited in the heat of the moment and after singing a few songs with very high notes, I found myself having breathing difficulties,” he told the site.

Wang, who lives in Nanchang county in Jiangxi province, told PearVideo he has performed the tunes before, without any issue.

Despite the chest pains, he decided to go home, the Nanchang News reported. He said the pain only got worse.

The next day, Wang went to the hospital, and doctors found he had indeed strained his lung.

“The patient suffered from a lung collapse because of the high lung pressure caused by singing high notes,” Peng Bin-fei, a doctor from emergency department at Nanchang hospital, told PearVideo. “It’s better not to sing for a period of over two hours.”

Good advice.

Chris Pastrick is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Chris at 412-320-7898, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.