‘MAGA bomber’ Cesar Sayoc gets 20 years for mailing explosives to Trump critics | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

‘MAGA bomber’ Cesar Sayoc gets 20 years for mailing explosives to Trump critics

1503927_web1_AFP_1JC2HQ
Getty Images
Cesar Sayoc Jr., who terrorized the country by mailing 16 faulty pipe bombs packed with glass shards to 13 prominent Democrats and to CNN headquarters, was sentenced to 20 years in prison Monday by a judge who said he concluded that the bombs purposely were not designed to explode.
1503927_web1_AFP_1JC2I9
Getty Images
A van covered in blue tarp is towed by FBI investigators on October 26, 2018, in Plantation, Fla., in connection with the 16 pipe bombs and suspicious packages mailed to top Democrats by Cesar Sayoc, Jr.

NEW YORK — The President Donald Trump superfan who sparked a nationwide manhunt by mailing pipe bombs to prominent Democrats was sentenced Monday to 20 years in prison.

Cesar Sayoc sent 16 pipe bombs to former President Barack Obama, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, former Vice President Joe Biden, CNN headquarters in Manhattan, actor Robert De Niro and others while in the throes of paranoid delusions fueled by Trump’s conspiracy theories.

Nicknamed the “MAGA bomber,” Sayoc faced a maximum sentence of life in prison for 65 counts relating to the spree. Prosecutors said he was responsible for a “massive law enforcement response (that) crippled parts of several major metropolitan areas.”

His sentencing came as Trump faced wide criticism for emboldening white supremacists after a mass shooting in El Paso, Texas.

“The defendant contemplated violence for years, planned his attack over the course of several months, and mailed 16 IEDs to 13 Victims around the country — while enjoying media coverage of the mass panic and fear he created,” prosecutors wrote.

Sayoc’s lawyers had argued he was a mentally ill outcast who became obsessed with Trump. The Florida man living in a van covered in stickers of Trump’s enemies in crosshairs damaged his brain with a serious steroid habit, they wrote. By the time of the 2018 congressional midterm elections, Sayoc was obsessed with Trump’s conspiracy theories. Sayoc believed he was being hunted by Democrats.

“In this darkness, Mr. Sayoc found light in Donald J. Trump,” Sayoc’s federal defenders wrote.

“He truly believed wild conspiracy theories he read on the internet, many of which vilified Democrats and spread rumors that Trump supporters were in danger because of them. He heard it from the President of the United States. A man with whom he felt he had a deep personal connection.”

Shortly before he was sentenced, Sayoc told the judge he was “beyond so very sorry for what I did.”

He blamed a life of mental illness, a childhood sexual assault he suffered at a boarding school, excessive use of steroids and his failure to listen to his mother, “the love of my life.”

“I was in deep denial. I understand now that I have committed a very serious crime,” Sayoc said.

Key to Sayoc’s defense was his claim that he never intended for the bombs to actually explode.

“I am not a chemist or scientist. It was just to scare and intimidate,” Sayoc wrote in one of several letters to Judge Jed Rakoff.

An FBI analysis confirmed the bombs were duds.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.