Man, 86, charged with shooting death in retirement community |

Man, 86, charged with shooting death in retirement community

Associated Press

MANCHESTER TOWNSHIP, N.J. — An 86-year-old man has been charged with murder in the shooting death of a 71-year-old Florida man at a retirement community in New Jersey, prosecutors said Tuesday.

Thomas Hatchett also faces a weapons charge stemming from the shooting at the Leisure Village West community in Manchester Township, prosecutors in Ocean County said. He remains in custody. Officials said they don’t believe he has an attorney to speak for him yet.

Manchester police went to Hatchett’s home shortly before 10 a.m. Monday after someone called 911 to report an injured person. A SWAT team also responded.

The officers found Igal Hedad lying face down in the street. The 71-year-old Fort Lauderdale man was bleeding from his head and had gunshot wounds to his back. He was pronounced dead at the scene shortly afterward.

The officers also saw what appeared to be a bullet hole in the front door of Hatchett’s home, prosecutors said. It was not clear, whether the shooting occurred inside or outside.

Hatchett had driven from the scene by the time authorities arrived, but he was found later Monday at another home he has in Verona, where he was captured, officials said.

A motive for the shooting has not been disclosed. Authorities also have not said whether the men knew each other.

No other injuries were reported.

Leisure Village West is a 2,692-unit complex, one of several adult communities in the area.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.