Man accused in plotting foiled terror attack pleads guilty | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Man accused in plotting foiled terror attack pleads guilty

Associated Press
1521842_web1_web-courts11

TOLEDO, Ohio — A man accused of plotting with his girlfriend to obtain guns and explosives for a foiled domestic terror attack pleaded guilty to a federal conspiracy charge.

Prosecutors said the pair had talked extensively about taking part in violent attacks on public places, visited the site of the Columbine High School massacre, and had bomb-making materials and weapons.

Vincent Armstrong, 23, of Toledo pleaded guilty Thursday to a charge related to conspiring to transport or receive an explosive with intent to cause harm. He faces up to 20 years in prison, but his sentencing has not been scheduled.

Armstrong had a duffel bag in his car filled with ammunition, a tactical vest, a trench coat and a T-shirt that said “society failed us,” federal authorities said in court documents.

His defense attorney declined to comment on Friday.

Authorities allege Armstrong’s girlfriend, 23-year-old Elizabeth Lecron, drove the plans. She has pleaded not guilty and her attorneys have not commented since her arrest in December.

Investigators said they found journal entries in which the pair discussed an attack. Lecron wrote about a mass killing at a bar along with an attack at a livestock farm or where she had worked, according to court documents.

The filings said the couple traveled to Colorado last August to see Columbine High School, where two students killed 12 classmates and a teacher in 1999. While away, the FBI searched their home in Toledo and said they found an AK-47, a shotgun and a stockpile of ammunition.

Lecron was arrested when she bought supplies for a bomb after undercover agents told her they wanted to blow up a pipeline, documents said.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.