ShareThis Page
Man told IRS he made $18,497 and requested a million dollar refund. They gave it to him. | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Man told IRS he made $18,497 and requested a million dollar refund. They gave it to him.

Steven Adams
760655_web1_web-money8

Filing your taxes involves the honor system. You fill in all your data and sign your name promising that everything is true. If you asked for one, the government then sends you a refund. Eventually things get reviewed, verified and, supposedly, settled up.

A Tampa man put the system to the test in 2017 when he reported his annual income as $18,497 and then asked the Internal Revenue Service to refund the balance of the million dollars he claimed was withheld from his earnings, reports the Tampa Bay Times.

Ramon Christopher Blanchett had the W-2 forms to back his income claim, although the Tampa Bay Times reports his actual earnings were even lower, and no taxes were withheld. Not a million dollars. None.

Based solely on Blanchett’s claim, the IRS cut him a check for $980,000.

He managed to stow the funds in several accounts and withdraw a cashiers check for $49,117, reports the Tampa Bay Times. He bought a 2016 silver Lexus RC350.

The IRS realized their mistake and seized the Lexus and the $919,251 Blanchett had left. They still want the $809 he got back when he cancelled the insurance on the Lexus.

Blanchett, who the Tampa Bay Times could not reach for comment, has not been charged with a federal crime.

Steven Adams is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Steven at 412-380-5645 or [email protected].

Categories: News | Top Stories | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.