Man who dragged shark from boat in Florida sentenced to 10 days in jail | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Man who dragged shark from boat in Florida sentenced to 10 days in jail

Samson X Horne
1675785_web1_shark-674867_1920

A Florida fisherman will spend 10 days in jail after pleading guilty to misdemeanor animal cruelty for dragging a live shark by the tail from a boat.

According to the Tampa Bay Times, Robert “Bo” Benac III was the last of three men facing charges stemming from the June 2017 incident.

The case became infamous when video surfaced of the men dragging the shark at high speeds behind their boat, shredding the animal. Other videos were found showing the men shooting a shark and pouring alcohol down the throats of live fish, according to The Associated Press.

The videos went viral when celebrity shark hunter, Mark “The Shark” Quartiano, saw them and expressed his disgust.

“That’s not a sportsman, that’s animal cruelty,” Quartiano told CBS News at the time.

Benac will also pay a $2,500 fine, perform 250 hours of service at an animal shelter and lose his fishing license for three years. He had been set to go on trial Thursday for felony aggravated cruelty to animals.

A second man, Michael Wenzel, accepted a similar plea earlier, The Times reported.

Benac got credit for a day in jail stemming from his arrest.

He is able to serve the rest of the time over the course of five weekends.

Samson X Horne is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Samson at 412-320-7845, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.