Man’s death during sex while on business trip ruled ‘workplace accident’ | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Man’s death during sex while on business trip ruled ‘workplace accident’

Chris Pastrick
1659356_web1_hotel-1330850_1920

Boy, the things that workers’ comp will cover these days.

While on a business trip, a technician for a French railway company died of a cardiac arrest after having sex with a woman he had met, BBC News reports.

Appeal court judges in Paris ruled recently that because Xavier X — his name in court records — was in Meung-sur-Loire, France, on assignment for TSO, the death counts as a workplace accident and his company is liable and his family is entitled to compensation.

According to court records, the company’s lawyers argued the employee — who was married — was not performing professional duties at the time of his death in 2013, saying he was instead committing an “adulterous sex act that he had had with a complete stranger” in her hotel room.

However, the judges said that French workers on business trips are “entitled to their employer’s protection for the duration of their mission … whether or not the accident takes place as part of a professional activity or as an act of normal life.”

The company was challenging a 2016 ruling by the state health insurance provider that categorized the death as an industrial accident. The Times of London reports in its ruling, the provider said “a sexual encounter is an act of normal life like taking a shower or eating a meal.”

As a result of the latest ruling, the family — partners and children — will get a monthly benefit of up to 80% of his salary until what would have been his retirement age. After that, they will get a share of his pension.

Chris Pastrick is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Chris at 412-320-7898, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Top Stories | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.