Minneapolis considering ban on new drive-thru windows | TribLIVE.com

Minneapolis considering ban on new drive-thru windows

Chris Pastrick

Can you imagine life without the convenience of drive-thru windows?

Well, leaders in one midwest city are trying to do just that.

The Minneapolis Star Tribune reports the city’s planning commission is supporting a zoning code amendment that would ban any new drive-thru window within city limits. Current drive-thru windows would be permitted to stay, being grandfathered into the new code.

The proposal cites “noise, extended idling, proliferation of curb cuts, conflicts with pedestrians and traffic generation” as reasons for cutting drive-thru windows.

“We know that we need to reduce our emissions significantly,” Planning Commission President Sam Rockwell told the Star Tribune. “Reducing that infrastructure that encourages driving is important.”

Currently, drive-thrus are permitted in only six of Minneapolis’ 23 zoning districts, so some say the move won’t affect much.

“On the surface, this seems like it is something that would seem controversial,” Commissioner Matthew Brown said. “But when you look at the small number of applications for new drive-throughs … it’s actually quite small.”

The move is part of the city’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan, which was passed last year by the City Council but has yet to be formally adopted.

The public will have a chance to speak out on the amendment during a public hearing in early June, and then head back to the planning commission for a vote before going to City Council.

Chris Pastrick is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Chris at 412-320-7898, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.