Nevada law prevents most employers from rejecting pot-users | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Nevada law prevents most employers from rejecting pot-users

1285786_web1_1285786-4c48d151c2b844969ccb962ae3cfdee8
AP
In this June 28, 2017 photo, Alessandro Cesario, the director of cultivation, works with marijuana plants at the Desert Grown Farms cultivation facility in Las Vegas. Nevada is set to pioneer a law to prevent job-seekers from being immediately rejected for work based on a positive marijuana test.
1285786_web1_1285786-ff7a36ab08c9480e9cc993d460d56e06
AP
In this July 1, 2017, file photo, people wait in line at the Essence cannabis dispensary in Las Vegas. Nevada is set to pioneer a law to prevent job-seekers from being immediately rejected for work based on a positive marijuana test.

LAS VEGAS — Two backers of a pioneering Nevada law to prevent employers from rejecting job-seekers based on a pre-employment marijuana test cast the effort Wednesday as an anti-discrimination measure in a state where recreational pot sales are booming and rules about legal marijuana consumption are evolving.

The law, which goes into effect in January, won’t ban testing job applicants for cannabis chemicals, Democratic Assembly members Dina Neal and Edgar Flores said. But it will prohibit many employers from using the results to turn someone away.

“We needed to ensure we were providing safeguards for marijuana users who are following state law and are trying to get jobs.” Flores said.

Neal said the law does not liberalize marijuana use in the workplace, where employers can and do prohibit drug or alcohol use.

It instead aims to address what Neal called “a moral and social dilemma” caused by the ability to detect trace amounts of marijuana in blood or urine weeks or even months after people ingest pot during off-work hours.

“I don’t condone marijuana use,” Neal said. “But I don’t want unfairness and discrimination. We were saying marijuana dispensaries can sell to people, but then the people couldn’t work. We had to do something.”

The law, signed by Democratic Gov. Steve Sisolak a week ago, contains broad exceptions for employers who declare they’re seeking people for safety positions such as firefighters, emergency medical technicians or federally licensed drivers.

“We want to make sure we have safety conscious individuals,” said Paul Enos, chief executive of the Nevada Trucking Association and one of several business representatives who testified at the Legislature to shape and revise the law.

He said that in his industry, not just truckers but mechanics and dispatchers could be considered safety positions.

“The bill gives employers a tremendous amount of discretion to determine whether or not the position they are hiring for could impact the safety of others,” Enos said. “They can still use positive test for marijuana to deny the job.”

The law makes it unlawful for would-be employers in Nevada “to fail or refuse to hire” a prospective employee whose screening test results indicate the presence of marijuana.

Employees who test positive can contest the results and seek a re-test, at their expense.

Even with the exceptions, a National Organization to Reform Marijuana Laws official said the law puts Nevada ahead of other states in addressing marijuana and employment issues.

Carly Wolf, NORML state policies coordinator, said some states protect medical marijuana patients from employment discrimination and New York City this year barred non-safety sensitive employers from administering marijuana drug tests to prospective employees.

“Those who consume conventional prescription medications or alcohol legally and responsibly while off the job do not suffer sanctions from their employers unless their work performance is adversely impacted,” Wolf said. “It’s about time that employers treat those who consume cannabis legally while away from the workplace in a similar manner.”

Neal worried that employers might exploit exemptions, and Flores said the law might need to be fine-tuned when the biennial state Legislature meets again in 2021.

“I’m hoping that it’s not abused and they’re not going to say a secretary is a safety position,” Neal said.

Riana Durrett, executive director of the Nevada Dispensary Association, called the law a step toward normalization of marijuana use by adults.

“It makes sense for us to start adjusting our laws to reflect that this is legal and it should be treated like alcohol,” she said.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.