North and South Carolina warn of Portuguese Man O’ Wars on beaches |

North and South Carolina warn of Portuguese Man O’ Wars on beaches

Frank Carnevale
A Portuguese Man O’ War is seen in file photo from 2011.
Wildlife officials announced that “a small number” of Portuguese Man O’ War, which are known for their strong, painful sting, have washed up on the South Carolina shore.

Wildlife officials in North Carolina and South Carolina are warning beachgoers about Portuguese Man O’ Wars in the ocean and on beaches.

On Friday, the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources posted to Facebook that a small number of the sea creatures were reported on state beaches.

The post warns, “You should steer clear of these highly venomous relatives of jellyfish both in the water and ashore, as even a dead man-of-war has a sting strong enough to sometimes require medical attention.”

Earlier in June, the Cape Hatteras National Seashore in North Carolina posted a similar warning. They warn, “Beachcombers beware – even dead ones washed up on shore can still deliver a sting.”

According to the National Ocean Service, the Portuguese Man O’ War (Physalia physalis) is closely related to jellyfish, but is actually a species of siphonophore, which is a colony of individual organisms working together.

Experts say a dead Man O’ War can create a sting strong enough to require medical attention.

Authorities say the sting to humans is excruciatingly painful but rarely deadly, according to the Associated Press.

The beaches of the Carolinas, and especially the Outer Banks area, remain favorite vacation spots for many residents of Western Pa.

Frank Carnevale is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Frank via Twitter .

Categories: News | Top Stories | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.