NRA sidelines its top lobbyist in latest sign of internal turmoil |

NRA sidelines its top lobbyist in latest sign of internal turmoil

The Washington Post
Nation Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action Executive Director Christopher W. Cox speaks April 26, 2019, at the NRA-ILA Leadership Forum in Lucas Oil Stadium in Indianapolis. In a lawsuit filed in New York against former NRA president Oliver North on Wednesday, June 19, 2019, the organization accuses Cox of conspiring with North to oust the NRA’s chief executive, Wayne LaPierre.

WASHINGTON — The National Rifle Association has sidelined its top lobbyist, Chris Cox, after accusing him in court documents of participating in what it called a failed extortion scheme to rid the organization of its top executive.

Cox, the NRA’s second-in-command and leader of its powerful political arm, was placed on administrative leave after the organization filed a lawsuit Wednesday in New York against former NRA President Oliver North, who resigned in April after accusing the NRA of exorbitant spending.

CEO Wayne LaPierre has accused North of attempting to extort the group. In its new suit, the NRA accused Cox of participating in a “conspiracy” with North.

NRA officials on Thursday confirmed that Cox has been suspended, declining to comment further.

Cox could not be reached for comment. In a statement to The New York Times, which first reported his suspension, Cox called the allegations “offensive and patently false. For 24 years I have been a loyal and effective leader in this organization.”

The abrupt ouster of Cox, a prominent figure in Washington, is the latest sign of disarray and turmoil at the organization, which has been roiled by accusations of misspending. The bitter infighting also comes as President Trump — who was the beneficiary of a record-setting $30 million boost from the NRA in 2016 — launches his reelection campaign.

Cox is one of the organization’s highest-profile leaders, featured on enormous banners at the group’s annual convention and in videos put out by the NRA, where he controlled a $33 million budget of the group’s political arm.

His suspension comes just weeks before a special legislative session on gun control in Virginia called by Gov. Ralph Northam, a Democrat, in response to the recent mass shooting in Virginia Beach.

Cox, who has led the political and lobbying arm of the NRA since 2002, received about $1.1 million in compensation in 2017, according to the NRA’s most recent tax filing. He is among three NRA executives whose contracts provide for severance payments amounting to their annual salaries for one to four more years “in the event of termination without cause or on the basis of specified adverse actions by the NRA,” according to the group’s filing with charity regulators in Massachusetts.

The NRA also placed one of Cox’s top deputies, Scott Christman, on administrative leave, officials said. Christman could not be reached for comment.

The internal power struggle that has riven the NRA burst into public view in April, when LaPierre told the board of directors that North was threatening the release of “a devastating account of our financial status” if the NRA chief did not step down. LaPierre accused North of working in concert with the group’s estranged public relations firm, Ackerman McQueen.

An attorney for North has declined to comment. But in a letter as he left his post as president, North warned that the organization’s finances were in “clear crisis.”

In its lawsuit against North, the NRA says North said he could work with Ackerman’s co-founder to negotiate an “excellent retirement” for LaPierre if he cooperated. It also implicated another board member, former Rep. Dan Boren, D-Okla., in the alleged scheme. Boren did not return a request for comment.

The lawsuit says emails and text messages “demonstrate that another errant NRA fiduciary, Chris Cox — once thought by some to be a likely successor for Mr. LaPierre — participated in the Ackerman/North/Boren conspiracy.”

The text messages included in the court filing appear to show Cox and another person talking about an “ultimatum,” but the broader context is unclear.

The lawsuit seeks to block North from having the NRA pay his legal fees associated with numerous suits involving the NRA and Ackerman, as well as for a Senate inquiry.

“Simply put, the NRA exists to fight for the Second Amendment,” the organization wrote in the lawsuit, “not pay other people’s bills.”

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.