ShareThis Page
Ohio bill would bar death penalty if ‘serious mental illness’ | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Ohio bill would bar death penalty if ‘serious mental illness’

Associated Press
1181428_web1_876439-470df9bd0934452a8043bd584d59c66e
AP
The interior of the lethal injection facility at San Quentin State Prison in San Quentin, Calif.

COLUMBUS — A bill now in Ohio’s Legislature would prevent people convicted of aggravated murder from being sentenced to the death penalty, if they are found to have had a “serious mental illness” at the time of the offense.

Republican Rep. Brett Hudson Hillyer, a primary sponsor of House Bill 136, testified last month before the House Criminal Justice Committee that the death penalty should be reserved for only the worst offenders, The Columbus Dispatch reported.

Hillyer, of Uhrichsville, said that while Ohioans may be split on the issue of legality concerning the death penalty, “most will concede executing an individual found to be suffering from a serious mental illness at the time of the crime is neither fair nor just.”

The bill has bipartisan support and support from mental health advocacy groups, including the Ohio Psychological Association, the Ohio Psychiatric Physician’s Association and the National Alliance on Mental Illness of Ohio, according to the newspaper.

Two criteria must apply for offenders to be deemed by professionals as having had a “serious mental illness,” under the bill.

They must have been diagnosed with schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder or delusional disorder. The condition also must have “significantly impaired the person’s capacity to exercise rational judgment” in following the law, or understanding the consequences or wrongfulness of their actions at the time of the offense.

The condition in those cases wouldn’t meet the standard for being found “not guilty by reason of insanity” or “incompetent to stand trial.”

Under the bill, a capital defendant found to have had a “serious mental illness” when the crime was committed would not be sentenced to death. The sentence would instead be life in prison without parole, life in prison with parole eligibility after 25 or 30 years, or a special type of life sentence under the Sexually Violent Predator Sentencing Law.

Death row inmates would be able to petition for resentencing, if they had a “serious mental illness” at the time of the crime.

Prosecutors in Ohio have opposed the legislation. Allen County Prosecutor Juergen Waldick testified that courts would be overwhelmed by the resentencing portion of the bill.

He said it’s “likely that every single person on death row would file such a motion,” and that would create more litigation to confirm that a person was properly sentenced previously.

A proponent of the bill says supporters aren’t asking that people not be responsible for their behavior.

“However, people with these mental illnesses don’t always know what they’re doing,” said Terry Russell, executive director of the National Alliance on Mental Illness of Ohio. “We don’t think it’s ethically or morally right to take their life because of it.”

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.