Woman says Ohio gunman showed her Tree of Life shooting video on 1st date | TribLIVE.com

Woman says Ohio gunman showed her Tree of Life shooting video on 1st date

Associated Press
Mourners visit a makeshift memorial outside Ned Peppers bar following a vigil at the scene of a mass shooting, Sunday, Aug. 4, 2019, in Dayton, Ohio. A masked gunman in body armor opened fire early Sunday in the popular entertainment district in Dayton, killing several people, including his sister, and wounding dozens before he was quickly slain by police, officials said.

An ex-girlfriend of the man who killed nine people in Dayton, Ohio, says he showed her a video of the Pittsburgh synagogue shooting on their first date.

Adelia Johnson said in an email to The Associated Press that she doesn’t know what would have caused him to open fire outside a strip of nightclubs early Sunday in Dayton.

Connor Betts, 24, was armed with a .223-caliber rifle with magazines capable of holding at least 100 rounds of ammunition when he fired off dozens of shots in a popular entertainment district, Police Chief Richard Biehl said.

Betts often joked about having dark thoughts, Johnson said. She said he told her that he had bipolar disorder and that his talk didn’t scare her because she thought it was a symptom of his mental illness.

The revelation of Betts’ showing Johnson the video comes 10 months after 11 people were gunned down inside Tree of Life synagogue in Squirrel Hill.

Johnson said she met Betts in a college psychology class this year, and they dated for a couple of months until May.

Betts was gunned down within 30 seconds of the start of his rampage, police said. Surveillance video police shared shows that officers shot Betts just before he could enter a bar. Some people inside took cover when the chaos broke out around 1 a.m. Sunday in the historic Oregon District.

Categories: News | Top Stories | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.