Oklahoma high court nullifies medical abortion restrictions | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Oklahoma high court nullifies medical abortion restrictions

Associated Press
1093172_web1_ptr-OklaSuprCourt-050119
Google
The Oklahoma Supreme Court says a state law that restricts women’s access to drug-induced abortions is unconstitutional.

OKLAHOMA CITY — The Oklahoma Supreme Court says a state law that restricts women’s access to drug-induced abortions is unconstitutional.

The decision handed down Tuesday overturns a 2014 state law that banned “off-label” use of mifepristone, a medication used for abortions, sometimes called RU-486.

The statute required that physician’s comply with the Federal Drug Administration’s 2000 label protocol for medically terminated pregnancies rather than the more effective 2016 label protocol. The Supreme Court ruled that “places a substantial obstacle in the path of women’s choice and places an undue burden on the woman’s rights.”

The ruling upholds an Oklahoma County judge’s 2017 ruling that overturned the law approved by the Republican-controlled Legislature and signed by former Gov. Mary Fallin.

Attorney General Mike Hunter’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.