Parents outraged after teacher gives autistic student ‘most annoying’ award | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Parents outraged after teacher gives autistic student ‘most annoying’ award

Steven Adams
1253648_web1_ClassroomSeats

It was a special education teacher who picked an 11-year-old autistic boy as the most annoying student of the year.

Akalis Castejon is non-verbal autistic. Occasionally he rocks back and forth or shakes, reports ABC News Chicago.

His family was shocked when his Northwest Indiana school presented Akalis with a trophy engraved with “Most Annoying Male” for 2018-19.

Rick and Estella Castejon said they see the award as bullying by the fifth-grader’s teacher at Bailly Preparatory Academy in Gary.

“You’d think one would know and understand the conditions of autism and have more patience to deal with children who suffer from autism,” Estella told ABC News.

“I didn’t want to cause a scene with other parents there, so I left the award on the table and tried walking away, but the teacher came back and said Akalis forgot his award,” Rick told ABC News.

They told the TV station that some of the other students got positive awards, such as “most improved” or “funniest.”

Rick reportedly said he is thankful his son does not understand the meaning of the award.

“When they called him up he was just excited to get a gold star because it was shiny,” he told ABC News.

“He just wants to be like everyone else. He is like everyone else, the difference is he cannot express himself like every other person does,” Estella told ABC News.

Estella sought an apology for the incident. Although she did not get one from the teacher or principal, the school district reportedly did apologize and took unspecified disciplinary action.

Steven Adams is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Steven at 412-380-5645 or [email protected].

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.