Parkland community worried after 2 survivors’ suicides |

Parkland community worried after 2 survivors’ suicides

Associated Press
In this Feb. 25, 2018 file photo, mourners bring flowers as they pay tribute at a memorial for the victims of the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, in Parkland, Fla.
In this Nov. 14, 2014 file photo, Jeremy Richman, father of Sandy Hook Elementary school shooting victim Avielle Richman, addresses the Sandy Hook Advisory Commission in Newtown, Conn.

FORT LAUDERDALE, Fla. — The community of Parkland, Florida, is focusing attention on its suicide prevention programs after two survivors of the Florida high school massacre killed themselves in a week.

Parkland Mayor Christine Hunschofsky said Monday that community leaders, government officials, parents, police and others held an emergency meeting Sunday after a second Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School student apparently killed himself over the weekend. That came a week after a recent graduate, who was close friends with victim Meadow Pollack, killed herself after her family said she suffered from survivor’s guilt.

The Feb. 14, 2018, shooting at the 3,200-student school killed 14 students and three staff members and wounded 17 others. Some students have begun counting the two suicides among the victims of the shooting.

Also Monday, police in Connecticut said the father of one of the 20 children slain at the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in 2012 was found dead in an apparent suicide. Newtown police say the body of 49-year-old Jeremy Richman was found inside Edmond Town Hall, where he had an office. Richman was the father of first-grader Avielle Richman. He and his wife had created The Avielle Foundation, a group dedicating to preventing violence by seeking a better understanding of brain health.

In Florida, getting urgent counseling resources to students could be more difficult because the school is on spring break this week.

Hunschofsky said the biggest push will be to alert parents that they need to talk to their children about whether they are having suicidal thoughts and outline the danger signs for them, such as personality changes or a preoccupation with death. The groups also want students to talk to and look out for each other, and note that programs already are in place — community counseling and resource centers opened after the shooting — where they can seek help.

“There are lots of resources out there, but everyone is in a different place with different levels of trauma and grief. It is our job to get the right resources to them,” she said. “There can never be enough resources, but the challenge is connecting people.”

Hunschofsky said that while there is concern the two suicides could lead to more, it is more dangerous not to discuss what happened.

“We cannot be afraid of talking — the only way we are going to identify people who need help is to talk about it,” she said.

In neighboring Coral Springs, where about half of Marjory Stoneman Douglas students live, spokeswoman Lynne Martzelle said the city will host a community anti-suicide prevention forum on Wednesday.

“The tragedy of Marjory Stoneman Douglas didn’t end on the 14th,” she said.

Cara Aiello told WFOR-TV last week that her daughter Sydney had been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder and struggled to attend college because she feared being in a classroom, but never asked for help. Aiello killed herself last week.

Coral Springs police officer Tyler Reik confirmed Monday that a student apparently killed himself Saturday, but said an official determination has not been made. That should happen later Monday.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.