ShareThis Page
Petition floats idea of selling Montana to Canada for $1 trillion |

Petition floats idea of selling Montana to Canada for $1 trillion

Frank Carnevale
The U.S. Treasury Department building in Washington, Thursday, June 8, 2017. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
A person poked a little fun at Montana by proposing to sell the state to Canada for $1 trillion to pay off the U.S. national debt.

A person poked a little fun at Montana by proposing to sell the state to Canada for $1 trillion to pay off the U.S. national debt.

Wait, maybe they’re on to something … Nah.

The petition was started by a user named Ian Hammond for a group called “Christian Mothers Against Private Education,” likely not a real group.

The description for the petition reads, “We have too much debt and Montana is useless. Just tell them it has beavers or something.”

The trillion-dollar deal sounds like a big payout, but the national debt just topped $22 trillion. There’s even a clock calculating the rising debt at U.S. Debt Clock.

The petition, posted last week, has garnered over 7,900 supporters as of Tuesday (there are hoping to get to 10,000).

Many added comments supporting the idea.

“You’re saying you want us to have free health care and legal marijuana……. sign me up”

“Can FL join this ‘sale to Canada’ deal too? I love Canada but 1. this would save us the $ of moving. 2. Canada is too cold 3. Most Canadians love FL anyway! 4. The US is a grade A mess (see what i did there Canada- like syrup). Please TAKE US AWAY!”

“So, would residents be called Montanucks or Canatans? Canamons? Canamontans? I got it! Canamontanucks!!!”

“I plan to retire next year, and I am torn between Montana, where I love to fly fish, or Canada, where there is no Trump. This would provide the best of all worlds.”

“I’m a Montanan and would love to be a Canadian too!”

Frank Carnevale is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Frank via Twitter .

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.