Pilgrim shutdown ends nuclear power era in Massachusetts | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Pilgrim shutdown ends nuclear power era in Massachusetts

Associated Press
1237252_web1_1237252-bf7d8ce7b8fd40579d84685a873a2aaf
Warning signs are posted near a gate to the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, in Plymouth, Mass., Tuesday, May 28, 2019. The operators of the nuclear plant performed a simulated shutdown at a training facility several miles from the reactor Tuesday, in advance of the actual shutdown of the aging reactor planned for Friday, May 31. (AP Photo/Steven Senne)
1237252_web1_1237252-26557db90e6b4b68ba74d8d01d01c061
Control Room Supervisor Bob Sheridan, of Duxbury, Mass., front, focuses on a screen during a simulated reactor shutdown Tuesday, May 28, 2019, in the Control Room Simulator at a training facility several miles from the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, in Plymouth, Mass. The simulated shutdown was performed in front of members of the media ahead of the planned actual shutdown of the aging reactor on Friday, May 31. (AP Photo/Steven Senne) Control Room Supervisor Bob Sheridan, of Duxbury, Mass., front, focuses on a screen during a simulated reactor shutdown Tuesday, May 28, 2019, in the Control Room Simulator at a training facility several miles from the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, in Plymouth, Mass. The simulated shutdown was performed in front of members of the media ahead of the planned actual shutdown of the aging reactor on Friday, May 31. (AP Photo/Steven Senne)
1237252_web1_1237252-34f6437d4cc6411e9cf217361698ab4a
Control Room Supervisor Bob Sheridan, of Duxbury, Mass., left, and Senior Reactor Operator Kelly Connerton, of Middleborough, Mass., center, stand together in the Control Room Simulator moments before a simulated reactor shutdown, Tuesday, May 28, 2019, at a training facility several miles from the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, in Plymouth, Mass. The simulated shutdown was performed in front of members of the media ahead of the planned actual shutdown of the aging reactor on Friday, May 31. (AP Photo/Steven Senne)
1237252_web1_1237252-6331e0c99d4943ffae5297a4051a1bb2
Senior Reactor Operator Christina Renaud, left, speaks with Training Supervisor Paul Gresh, center, and Control Room Supervisor Bob Sheridan, right, in the Control Room Simulator moments before a simulated reactor shutdown, Tuesday, May 28, 2019, at a training facility several miles from the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, in Plymouth, Mass. The simulated shutdown was performed in front of members of the media Tuesday ahead of the planned actual shutdown of the aging reactor on Friday, May 31. (AP Photo/Steven Senne)
1237252_web1_1237252-31045e4058c340be888e7154f0cee3ac
A sign featuring an Entergy Corp. logo is attached to a sign near a gate to the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station, in Plymouth, Mass., Tuesday, May 28, 2019. The operators of the nuclear plant performed a simulated shutdown at a training facility several miles from the reactor Tuesday, in advance of the actual shutdown of the aging reactor planned for Friday, May 31. (AP Photo/Steven Senne)

PLYMOUTH, Mass. — The Pilgrim nuclear power plant in Plymouth has permanently shut down after 47 years of generating electricity, bring to a close the era of nuclear power in Massachusetts.

The final shutdown occurred at 5:28 p.m. Friday.

Entergy announced in 2015 it would retire Massachusetts’ only remaining reactor, citing competition from less expensive energy sources.

Entergy had said the shutdown would take about five hours with technicians first reducing Pilgrim’s power output from the 40% to 26% to about 8%, before launching the final step of inserting control rods into the fuel assembly to seal off further nuclear reactions.

The focus now turns to the daunting task of cleaning up and dismantling the plant. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is reviewing Entergy’s proposal to sell Pilgrim to a private nuclear waste management firm that promises a speedier decommissioning.

The closing leaves Seabrook in New Hampshire and Millstone in Connecticut as New England’s only still-operating commercial nuclear plants.

———

A closer look at Pilgrim’s shutdown:

WHAT DOES IT MEAN FOR REGIONAL ENERGY SUPPLIES?

Pilgrim’s retirement and the loss of its 680 megawatts of power aren’t likely to disrupt overall regional energy supplies or the reliability of the electrical grid, according to experts.

ISO-New England, which operates the region’s bulk power system, says three new power plants that can burn either natural gas or oil will be online by this summer and several small solar facilities and a new wind farm will also help absorb the impact.

“We’ve actually seen more megawatts coming in than the megawatts of Pilgrim that are leaving,” said Anne George, a vice president for ISO.

The shutdown could result in a short-term increase in carbon emissions because of the greater reliance on the gas and oil-burning plants, she added, though longer range trends point to growth in cleaner, renewable energy sources.

It’s unclear whether Pilgrim’s closing could affect consumer prices. George noted that nuclear power generally enters the electricity market at lower prices than most other fuels.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

It’s far from certain how decommissioning will unfold.

Entergy announced plans last year to sell Pilgrim, along with several other retiring U.S. reactors, to Holtec International for decommissioning. The deals are awaiting NRC approval.

Holtec is promising an aggressive schedule for cleaning up and removing the physical plant within eight years at an estimated cost of $1.1 billion. Absent the sale, Entergy would place Pilgrim into so-called “safe storage” mode under a $1.6 billion decommissioning plan that could last up to 60 years.

Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey has raised several concerns about the proposed sale and has requested NRC hold public hearings before signing off.

Holtec has never owned a commercial nuclear plant.

WHERE DOES RADIOACTIVE FUEL GO?

Pilgrim’s more than 4,000 spent fuel rod assemblies will initially be placed in “wet storage” — essentially large pools of water where the superhot fuel is cooled for at least two years.

Next comes the “dry storage” phase: The spent fuel is transferred into giant metal and concrete-reinforced cylinders that stay at the site unless or until a national nuclear waste storage facility is created.

Existing storage casks are kept on a pad adjacent to the reactor, roughly 300 feet (91 meters) from ocean’s edge and 25 feet (7.6 meters) above sea level. Plans are in the works to build a larger pad and relocate it about 75 feet above sea level, in part as protection from flooding or erosion induced by climate change.

WHO PAYS FOR DECOMMISSIONING?

U.S. reactors are required to maintain decommissioning trust funds to cover the facilities’ eventual decontamination and dismantling.

Public records show Pilgrim’s fund was most recently valued at just over $1 billion.

Unused portions of the fund can continue to grow during decommissioning, but it’s unclear what might happen should the money run out before the job is complete. Holtec has offered assurances it has financial resources to cover unexpected delays or cost overruns.

HOW IS PLYMOUTH IMPACTED?

Decommissioning requires fewer employees and Pilgrim’s workforce is expected to fall from the current 580 to about 270 by March 2020.

In addition to losing jobs, Plymouth will also receive less revenue from the plant, even as the historic town prepares for celebrations marking the 400th anniversary of the Mayflower landing in 1620.

Town Meeting voters recently approved an agreement calling for payments in lieu of taxes of $7 million next fiscal year and $6.5 million the following year. Plymouth is getting $8.5 million from Pilgrim in this fiscal year.

Categories: News | World | Technology
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.