Police killing of pipe-wielding NYC man called legal | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Police killing of pipe-wielding NYC man called legal

Associated Press
956476_web1_956476-14036ec1818f497a84d8c169ef330b1e
This April 5, 2018, file photo shows hundreds rallying for a march to the 71st Precinct on Empire Boulevard to protest Wednesday’s fatal police shooting of Saheed Vassell, a 34-year-old in the Crown Heights neighborhood of the Brooklyn borough of New York. Police officers were “legally justified” in the killing of a mentally disturbed man they said was wielding a piece of pipe like a gun on a New York City street, according to a report on the shooting released Friday, March 29, 2019. The review by the office of New York Attorney General Letitia James cleared New York Police Department officers who opened fired on Saheed Vassell in response to reports of an armed man menacing people on the streets of Brooklyn in 2018. “Based of a review of all the evidence … the NYPD officers who shot Mr. Vassell were legally justified,” the report concluded. (AP Photo/Craig Ruttle, File)
956476_web1_956476-5b8a08f703a04a7a8a935bcc38b33e44
This April 5, 2018, file photo provided by the New York Police Department shows a metal object at the scene where police officers fatally shot a man who was reported to be threatening people with a gun, which turned out to be a metal pipe that police mistook for a firearm, in the Brooklyn borough of New York. Saheed Vassell, 34, was killed in the Crown Heights neighborhood of Brooklyn. Police officers were “legally justified” in the killing of a mentally disturbed man they said was wielding a piece of pipe like a gun on a New York City street, according to a report on the shooting released Friday, March 29, 2019. The review by the office of New York Attorney General Letitia James cleared New York Police Department officers who opened fired on Saheed Vassell in response to reports of an armed man menacing people on the streets of Brooklyn in 2018. “Based of a review of all the evidence … the NYPD officers who shot Mr. Vassell were legally justified,” the report concluded. (New York Police Department via AP)

NEW YORK — Police officers were “legally justified” in the killing of a mentally disturbed man they said was wielding a piece of pipe like a gun on a New York City street, according to a report on the shooting released Friday.

The review by the office of New York Attorney General Letitia James cleared New York Police Department officers who opened fire on Saheed Vassell in response to reports of an armed man menacing people on the streets of Brooklyn in 2018.

The report said the victim had a history of mental illness, but the officers didn’t know about it. It also cited transcripts of 911 calls from witness saying that Vassell was pointing an object that appeared to be a pistol.

Security videotape released by police shortly after the incident showed the 34-year-old man raising the object in a two-handed shooting stance at officers just before they unleashed 10 shots that left him dead. His weapon turned out to be an L-shaped section of pipe from a welding tool.

The killing sparked unrest by protesters saying it was another example of an unarmed black man dying at the hands of police officers.

There was no immediate response to a message left Friday seeking comment from a lawyer for Vassell’s family.

In a statement, Police Commissioner James O’Neill said the NYPD would consider recommendations by the attorney general to improve how it responses to similar situations.

“The death of Mr. Vassell was a tragedy that no police officer – or anyone – would ever want to occur,” O’Neill said.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.