Prosecutor could decide on seventh trial in Mississippi case | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Prosecutor could decide on seventh trial in Mississippi case

Associated Press
1326569_web1_1326569-3f3fbed7173d44239d567474fad850b6
FILE - In this June 14, 2010 file photograph, Clemmie Flemming points out to prosecutor Doug Evans, center, where she spotted Curtis Giovanni Flowers on the morning of four slayings at Tardy Furniture in Greenwood, Miss. Evans, a Mississippi prosecutor who has tried the same man six times in a death penalty case now will decide whether to seek a seventh trial after the U.S. Supreme Court found racial bias in jury selection. (Taylor Kuykendall/The Commonwealth via AP, File)
1326569_web1_1326569-30556b049a8746fd9fc811a684b02476
This Aug. 3, 2017 photo provided by Mississippi Department of Corrections shows Curtis Flowers, who’s murder case has gone to trial six times. The Supreme Court is throwing out the murder conviction and death sentence for Flowers because of a prosecutor’s efforts to keep African Americans off the jury. The defendant already has been tried six times and now could face a seventh trial. The court’s 7-2 decision Friday says the removal of black prospective jurors violated the rights of inmate Curtis Flowers.(Mississippi Department of Corrections via AP)
1326569_web1_1326569-6055130a919543e581f7a2f55349cbd0
FILE - In this March 20, 2019 file photo, Attorney Sheri Johnson leaves the Supreme Court after challenging a Mississippi prosecutor’s decision to keep African-Americans off the jury in the trial of Curtis Flowers, in Washington. The Supreme Court is throwing out the murder conviction and death sentence for Flowers because of a prosecutor’s efforts to keep African Americans off the jury. The defendant already has been tried six times and now could face a seventh trial. The court’s 7-2 decision Friday says the removal of black prospective jurors violated the rights of inmate Curtis Flowers. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

JACKSON, Miss. — A Mississippi prosecutor has tried and failed six times to send Curtis Flowers to the death chamber, with the latest trial conviction and death sentence overturned on Friday because of racial bias in jury selection. Now, that same prosecutor must decide whether to try Flowers a seventh time.

Doug Evans, who’s running unopposed this year for an eighth four-year term as district attorney for a seven-county swath of rural northern Mississippi, has shown no inclination to give up.

Flowers is accused of killing four people, execution-style, in a furniture store in 1996 in the town of Winona. Evans has tried Flowers six times, with four convictions overturned and two other cases ended in mistrials.

Evans’ efforts to keep black jurors off of Flowers’ case were at the center of Flowers’ appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. In an opinion by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, the court ruled 7-2 on Friday that during more than 20 years, Evans pursued a “relentless, determined effort to rid the jury of black individuals,” with the goal of an all-white jury.

Evans didn’t return an email seeking comment Friday, and phones at his office in Grenada went unanswered. He told reporters for American Public Media’s “In the Dark” podcast that he hadn’t decided whether to try Flowers again, but remained confident of his guilt.

“There’s no question about (Flowers’) guilt. There never has been,” Evans told the podcast. “Courts are just like me and you. Everybody’s got opinions.”

He disputes the high court’s conclusion that he sought to exclude black jurors

“If they said that, that is not true,” Evans told the podcast.

The case began July 16, 1996, when four people were found shot to death inside Tardy Furniture in downtown Winona: 59-year-old owner Bertha Tardy and three employees — 45-year-old Carmen Rigby, 42-year-old Robert Golden and 16-year-old Derrick “Bobo” Stewart.

Months later, authorities arrested Flowers for the slayings. Prosecutors say he was a disgruntled former employee who sought revenge because Tardy fired him and withheld most of his pay to cover the cost of merchandise he damaged. Nearly $300 was missing after the killings.

Relatives of the victims are steadfast that Flowers is the killer.

“There is no justice,” Carmen Rigby’s widower, Benny Rigby, told the Clarion Ledger on Friday. “If he was white, he would have been executed by now.”

The defense, however, says it’s not just that jury selection was flawed — it’s that Flowers is innocent. They say witness statements and physical evidence against Flowers are too weak to convict him. A jailhouse informant who claimed Flowers had confessed to him recanted in recorded telephone conversations with “In the Dark.” Those reporters also turned up at least one possible other suspect whose existence was never disclosed to defense lawyers.

Flowers’ lawyers in a separate state court appeal were also raising questions about evidence, meaning the prosecution could face a stronger defense in a seventh trial.

Friday’s Supreme Court ruling could also enable the now-49-year-old Flowers to get out from behind bars for the first time since his arrest, even if there is another trial. Many Mississippi judges are reluctant to grant bail to defendants in cases where the death penalty is on the line. But a little-known state law says a judge must set bail in cases where there have been two mistrials on an indictment charging someone with a capital crime.

“There’s a strong argument that the statute requires bail to be set for Mr. Flowers,” said Tom Fortner, a prominent Mississippi defense lawyer who has cited that law in another case.

Defense attorneys could also seek to remove Evans and state court Judge Joseph Loper from the case. The defense asked Loper to recuse himself in the 2010 trial, claiming he was biased because he had ordered two jurors arrested for perjury at the end of the 2008 trial. Loper refused.

“The remedy might be the defense files a motion to force the DA to be recused because of misconduct,” Fortner said. “Then the court would have to appoint another prosecutor.”

During oral arguments , Supreme Court justices asked why Mississippi Attorney General Jim Hood hadn’t intervened. But Hood contends he can’t take over for Evans unless Evans invites him. Hood’s office has the power to prosecute some kinds of cases directly, such as white collar crime or child pornography. But some case law suggests he can’t barge in on other types of cases without permission from the local district attorney.

“It will be up to the DA as to whether to re-evaluate or retry,” Hood said Friday in Biloxi. “I’m confident that the Supreme Court’s comments will be followed. I don’t have the authority to go take a case away from a DA.”

If Evans steps away or is recused, Hood said he would prefer that another district attorney be named to try the case, citing the small number of prosecutors in his office. Hood, a Democrat and former small-town district attorney who’s running for governor, said he hadn’t talked to Evans.

“I think Doug will follow what the U.S. Supreme Court’s directives are …,” Hood said. “I don’t want to come out like I’m saying Doug ought to recuse himself. Please make that clear.”

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.