ShareThis Page
Roger Stone posts photo of judge in his case featuring crosshairs symbol despite gag order | TribLIVE.com
U.S./World

Roger Stone posts photo of judge in his case featuring crosshairs symbol despite gag order

768142_web1_AP19046723012479
Former campaign adviser for President Trump, Roger Stone, leaves federal court in Washington.

Roger Stone took aim at the federal judge overseeing his criminal case on Monday, blasting her as an “Obama appointed” partisan and posting a photo of her face featuring what appeared to be a crosshairs symbol.

The embattled confidant to President Trump posted the picture of Washington, D.C., Judge Amy Berman Jackson on Instagram but quickly deleted it after the New York Daily News reached out and asked about the apparent rifle scope symbol in the upper left-hand corner.

Stone, who was indicted in special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation last month, claimed he “didn’t notice the symbol in the corner.”

“I saw no such thing,” Stone told the Daily News. “It is simply a photo of the judge off the Internet.”

Minutes later, Stone deleted the photo and replaced it with one cropping out the crosshairs.

“Through legal trickery, Deep State hitman Robert Mueller has guaranteed that my upcoming show trial is before Judge Amy Berman Jackson, an Obama appointed Judge who dismissed the Benghazi charges against Hillary Clinton and incarcerated Paul Manafort prior to his conviction for any crime,” Stone captioned the since-deleted post, which also requested that people donate to his legal defense fund.

Stone, 66, fired off the missive even though Jackson issued a gag order in his case Friday, barring him and his legal team from making any public statements that could “pose a substantial likelihood of material prejudice to this case.”

Stone, whose indictment stems from his 2016 contacts with WikiLeaks, shrugged off the gag order Monday and said his attorney had told him the Instagram post was not in violation.

“My criticism is of the manner in which my case was mandated before a specific judge rather than randomly,” Stone said. “There can be no misinterpretation since I didn’t notice the symbol in the corner.”

Stone’s Hillary Clinton comment appeared to reference Jackson’s dismissal of a wrongful death lawsuit against the former secretary of state filed in 2017 by the families of two U.S. citizens killed in the 2012 attack at the American Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

Jackson, who was appointed by President Barack Obama in 2011, has gained some national attention since Mueller began his investigation into possible collusion between Russians and Trump associates ahead of the 2016 election.

She has overseen Paul Manafort’s high-profile case and ordered the disgraced one-time Trump campaign chairman behind bars after she ruled he had tried to tamper with witnesses in the special counsel’s investigation.

Stone remains free on $250,000 bond.

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.