She wanted a Mariah Carey cake and got Marie Curie instead |

She wanted a Mariah Carey cake and got Marie Curie instead

Chris Pastrick

Call it a case of mis-cake-n identity.

A woman in England, named Siobhan, told her co-workers that, for her birthday, she would like a cake with the likeness of one of her favorite singers: Mariah Carey.

However, what she was presented with was not the woman who’s been awarded a Grammy, but the woman who was awarded a Nobel.

See, the baker made a Marie Curie cake instead.

“My cousin in England told her colleagues she wanted a Mariah Carey birthday cake,” Twitter user Harriet Alida Lye wrote. “They misunderstood, and is the cake they made her instead. It’s Marie Curie, looking very festive.”

We must admit the French physicist does look quite festive.

Even Ms. Carey herself was impressed.

We gotta say, Carey should be quite honored to be mistaken for the first woman to win a Nobel (and still the only woman to do it twice).

It seems like the gaffe was intentional, as a fun prank on Siobhan by her co-workers at the HOPE for Chronic Conditions. And Siobhan took it in good spirits.

Lye’s tweet has generated well north of 200,000 likes and more than 43,000 retweets. And the responses have been wonderful.

All we can say is, “Happy birthday, Siobhan.”

Chris Pastrick is a Tribune-Review digital producer. You can contact Chris at 412-320-7898, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | World
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.